9 Questions for Facebook After Zuckerberg’s Privacy Manifesto
presented an entirely new philosophy. For 15 years, the stated goal of Facebook has been to make the world more open and connected; the unstated goal was constructing a targeted advertising system built on nearly infinite data. Yesterday, though, Zuckerberg pronounced that the company is reversing course. The social network of the future won’t be…
presented an entirely new philosophy. For 15 years, the stated goal of Facebook has been to make the world more open and connected; the unstated goal was constructing a targeted advertising system built on nearly infinite data. Yesterday, though, Zuckerberg pronounced that the company is reversing course. The social network of the future won’t be one where everyone connects openly together, as in a town square; it will be one where more connections happen one to one, as in a living room. Instead of data permanence, data will disappear.
Facebook isn’t putting the current platform—worth roughly half a trillion dollars—in the garbage disposal. As Zuckerberg made clear in a Wednesday afternoon interview with WIRED, Facebook as we know it now will still exist. But it will change. And there will also just be something new.
It’s unclear the extent to which Facebook will ultimately push users toward privacy, and in what exact ways. But Zuckerberg controls Facebook, and his manifesto will make its gears start to turn in different directions. As that begins, here are nine important questions the company will have to think through.
1. Facebook knows how to make money in the town square. How does it make money in this new living room?
Private, encrypted messaging is hard to monetize. In our interview, Zuckerberg demurred when asked what the new business model will be after clamping down on the data firehose. The company would, he said, build the product first and figure out the financials later. Facebook does have nascent efforts in commerce and cryptocurrency, but there’s no question that figuring out revenue on the new platform will be a hard problem for Dave Wehner, Facebook’s chief financial officer. A former Facebook employee told me last night, “Mark is like a cartoon character who walks through a bunch of dangerous situations and always comes out on top. Dave is the guy running behind him catching the cat, stopping the ladder from tipping, deflecting the flying axe with a manhole cover.”
2. What does this do to safety on the platform?
Facebook rightly faces endless criticism for all the data it collects. But there are benefits to data collection as well. It can help stop bullies, or even potential suicides. Once those communications become private, Facebook no longer has the same powers to track and moderate. The public—from the media, to nonprofits, to academics, to individuals, to the government—also uses the public nature of Facebook to track bad behavior. If Russian intelligence operatives had just used private encrypted messaging to manipulate Americans, would they have been caught? As Facebook knows from running WhatsApp, which is already end-to-end encrypted, policing abuses gets ever harder as messages get more hidden.
In our interview, Zuckerberg explained that this, not fears about the business model, is what keeps him up at night. “There is just a clear trade-o
Tech Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email A simple explainer on what quantum computing actually is, and why it is terrifying for bitcoin Most simplifies the complex process of quantum computing as “it can be 0 and 1 at the same time.” That is not an explanation for
Published
7 hours ago
in
By
Tech
Share this article
X (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail
A simple explainer on what quantum computing actually is, and why it is terrifying for bitcoin
Most simplifies the complex process of quantum computing as “it can be 0 and 1 at the same time.” That is not an explanation for why it threatens Bitcoin. This is.
Google has published research suggesting a future quantum computer could theoretically derive a bitcoin private key from its public key in about nine minutes, threatening the security of Bitcoin and other cryptographic systems.
Unlike classical computers, which process bits as either 0 or 1, quantum computers use qubits that can exist in multiple states simultaneously and exploit phenomena like superposition and entanglement to explore many possibilities at once.
This fundamentally different form of computation could undermine the mathematical assumptions behind current encryption, raising urgent concerns about the safety of existing blockchain assets and digital security more broadly.
This week, Google published a paper describing how a quantum computer could theoretically derive a bitcoin private key in 9 minutes, with ramifications that stretch to Ethereum, other tokens, private banking, and potentially everything in the world.
Quantum computing is easy to mistake for a faster version of a regular computer. But it is not a more powerful chip or a bigger server farm. It is a fundamentally different kind of machine, different at the level of the atom itself.
A quantum computer starts with a very cold, very small loop of metal where particles begin to behave in ways they do not behave under normal conditions on Earth, ways that alter what we think of as the basic rules of physics.
Understanding what that means, physically, is the difference between reading about the quantum threat and actually grasping it.
How computers and quantum computers actually work
Regular computers store information as bits — each is either a 0 or a 1. A bit is a tiny switch. Physically, it’s a transistor on a “chip” — a microscopic gate that either lets electricity through (1) or doesn’t (0).
Every photo, every bitcoin transaction, every word you’ve ever typed is stored as patterns of these switches being on or off. There is nothing mysterious about a bit; it is a physical object in one of the two definite states.
Every calculation is just shuffling these 0s and 1s around really fast. A modern chip can do billions of these per second, but it still does them one at a time, in sequence.
Quantum computers use something known as qubits instead of bits. A qubit can be 0, 1, or — and this is the weird part — both at the same time!
This is possible as a qubit is a completely different kind of physical object. The most common version, and the one Google uses, is a tiny loop of superconducting metal cooled to about 0.015 degrees above absolute zero, colder than outer space but here on Earth.
At that temperature, electricity flows through the loop without any resistance, and the current is said to exist in a quantum state.
In the superconducting loop, current can flow clockwise (call that 0) or counterclockwise (call that 1). But at quantum scales, the current does not have to pick one direction and actually flows in both directions simultaneously.
Don’t mistake it for switching between the two really fast. The current is measurably, experimentally and verifiably in both states simultaneously.
Mind-bending physics
With us so far? Great, because here’s where it gets genuinely strange, because the physics behind how it works isn’t immediately intuitive, and it is not supposed to be.
Everything someone interacts with in daily life obeys classical physics, which assumes that things are in one place at one time. But particles do not behave this way at the subatomic scale.
An electron does not have a definite position until you look at it. A photon does not have a definite polarization until you measure it. A current in a superconducting loop does not flow in a definite direction until you force it to pick.
The reason we don’t experience this in everyday life is decoherence. When a quantum system interacts with its environment, air molecules, heat, vibrations and light, the superposition collapses almost instantly.
A football cannot be in two places at once because it is interacting with trillions of air molecules, dust, sound, heat, gravity, etc., every nanosecond. But isolate a tiny current in a near-absolute-zero vacuum, shield it from every possible disturbance, and the quantum behavior survives long enough to compute with.
That’s why quantum computers are so hard to build. People are engineering physical environments where the laws of physics that normally prevent this stuff from happening are held at bay for just long enough to run a calculation.
Google’s machines operate in dilution refrigerators the size of huge rooms, colder than anything in the natural universe, surrounded by layers of shielding against electromagnetic noise, vibration, and thermal radiation.
And the qubits are fragile even then. They lose their quantum state constantly, which is why “error correction” dominates every conversation about scaling up.
So quantum computing is not a faster version of classical computing. It is exploiting a different set of physical laws that only apply at extremely small scales, extremely low temperatures, and extremely short timeframes.
Now stack that up.
Two regular bits can be in one of four states (00, 01, 10, 11), but only one at a time (since current flows in only one direction). Two qubits can represent all four states at once, as the current is flowing in all directions at the same time.
Three qubits represent eight states. Ten qubits represent 1,024. Fifty qubits represent over a quadrillion. The number doubles with every qubit that is added, which is why the scaling is so exponential.
The second trick is something called entanglement. When two qubits are entangled, measuring one instantly tells an observer something about the other, no matter how far apart they are. This lets a quantum computer coordinate across all those simultaneous states in a way that regular parallel computing cannot.
And these quantum computers are set up so that wrong answers cancel each other out (like overlapping waves that flatten) and right answers reinforce each other (like waves that stack higher). By the end of the computation, the correct answer has the highest probability of being measured.
So it’s not brute-force speed. It’s a fundamentally different approach to calculation — one that lets nature explore an exponentially large space of possibilities and then collapses to the right answer through physics rather than logic.
A monumental threat to cryptography
This mind-bending physics is why it is terrifying for encryption.
The math protecting bitcoin relies on the assumption that checking every possible key would take longer than the age of the universe.
But a quantum computer doesn’t check every key. It explores all of them simultaneously and uses interference to surface the right one.
That is where it ties into Bitcoin. Going one direction, from private key to public key, takes milliseconds. Going the other direction, from public key back to private key, would take a classical computer a million years, or even longer than the age of the universe. That asymmetry is the only thing proving that a person is holding their coins.
A quantum computer running an algorithm called Shor’s can go through that trapdoor in reverse. Google’s paper this week showed it could do so with far fewer resources than anyone previously estimated, and within a timeframe that races against bitcoin’s own block confirmations.
This is why the threat of quantum computers breaking blockchain encryption is genuinely making everyone very worried.
How that attack works step by step, what Google’s paper specifically changed, and what it means for the 6.9 million bitcoin already exposed, is the subject of the next piece in this series.
Bitcoin News
More For You
Industry leaders are pouring hundreds of millions into a rescue plan for Aave users after massive crypto hack
By Margaux Nijkerk|Edited by Aoyon Ashraf
4 hours ago
The response to the DeFi recovery fund has quickly extended beyond Aave, and in some cases began with direct outreach.
What to know:
Aave is spearheading a coordinated DeFi recovery effort after the Kelp DAO exploit, with more than $300 million in pledged support from major players like Consensys, Lido, EtherFi, and others, though much remains subject to governance approval.
Contributions span donations, deposits, and credit lines, while Aave is also seeking to…
Read full story
Latest Crypto News
Industry leaders are pouring hundreds of millions into a rescue plan for Aave users after massive crypto hack
4 hours ago
Bitcoin rally shows signs of fatigue as key indicators turn bearish
4 hours ago
Western Union eyeing stablecoin launch to settle global transactions without SWIFT, CEO says
5 hours ago
MARA Holdings targets bitcoin quantum threat and network resilience with new foundation
7 hours ago
Bitcoin pulls back to $76,600 as rising oil price and Iran risks stall the rally
8 hours ago
Curve founder pitches market-based fix for $700K bad debt in contrast to Aave bailout
9 hours ago
Top Stories
Bitmine buys $236 million in ether as Tom Lee touts ETH as ‘wartime store of value’
12 hours ago
A long-time developer wants to split Bitcoin blockchain and reassign Satoshi coins. The community is calling it a theft
18 hours ago
Michael Saylor’s Strategy buys 3,273 bitcoin as it inches closer to its 1 million target
11 hours ago
Bitcoin is climbing on thin volume, leaving rally vulnerable to macro shock
9 hours ago
Bitcoin funds take in $933 million as crypto ETFs hit highest AUM since February
13 hours ago
Pudgy Penguins, BAYC rally masks a shrinking NFT market as volumes and users fall
Bitcoin is currently exhibiting mixed signals since it’s finding itself at important levels of support and resistance. The momentum still favors neither buyers nor sellers as the crypto tries to establish where it will head, either upwards or downwards, towards the lower support. At the time of writing…
Published
7 hours ago
in
By
Bitcoin is currently exhibiting mixed signals since it’s finding itself at important levels of support and resistance. The momentum still favors neither buyers nor sellers as the crypto tries to establish where it will head, either upwards or downwards, towards the lower support. At the time of writing… Read More
Something is shifting in the Bitcoin chart, and the traders watching closest are already moving. A new Mercado Bitcoin study found that BTC beats gold and the S&P 500 in the 60 days after every major global shock, and with the Iran crisis still fresh, the setup points to a massive bounce…
Published
7 hours ago
in
By
Something is shifting in the Bitcoin chart, and the traders watching closest are already moving. A new Mercado Bitcoin study found that BTC beats gold and the S&P 500 in the 60 days after every major global shock, and with the Iran crisis still fresh, the setup points to a massive bounce… Read More
James Wynn, the high-leverage crypto trader known for turning $7,600 into $25 million on PEPE, warned traders that markets will deteriorate further before recovering. Wynn outlined a multi-asset defensive strategy, shorting US equities and going long on oil while selectively buying Bitcoin (BTC) dips with spot capital…
Published
7 hours ago
in
By
James Wynn, the high-leverage crypto trader known for turning $7,600 into $25 million on PEPE, warned traders that markets will deteriorate further before recovering. Wynn outlined a multi-asset defensive strategy, shorting US equities and going long on oil while selectively buying Bitcoin (BTC) dips with spot capital… Read More