Microsoft

File Archiving Software Market to Witness Massive Growth by Veritas, Barracuda, Smarsh

Edison, NJ — (SBWIRE) — 07/30/2021 — Stay up-to-date and exploit latest trends of File Archiving Software Market with latest edition released by AMA.File Archiving Software Market Comprehensive Study is an expert and top to bottom investigation on the momentum condition of the worldwide File Archiving Software industry with an attention on the Global market.…

Published 3 years ago in
File Archiving Software Market to Witness Massive Growth by Veritas, Barracuda, Smarsh

Edison, NJ — (SBWIRE) — 07/30/2021 — Stay up-to-date and exploit latest trends of File Archiving Software Market with latest edition released by AMA.File Archiving Software Market Comprehensive Study is an expert and top to bottom investigation on the momentum condition of the worldwide File Archiving Software industry with an attention on the Global market. The report gives key insights available status of the File Archiving Software producers and is an important wellspring of direction and course for organizations and people keen on the business. By and large, the report gives an inside and out understanding of 2021-2026 worldwide File Archiving Software Market covering extremely significant parameters.Key Players in This Report Include,
Google (United States),Microsoft (United States),IBM (United States) ,Dell (United States),Veritas (United States),HPE (United States),Barracuda (United States) ,Proofpoint (United States) ,Smarsh (United States) ,Mimecast (United Kingdom),ZL Technologies (United States),Global Relay (Canada)Free Sample Report + All Related Graphs & Charts @: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/sample-report/100305-global-file-archiving-software-marketBrief Summary of File Archiving Software:
ile archiving software enables you to conserve space on your file server and store content indefinitely and securely, using the proven strength of archiving technologies. Automate the capture of shared file systems into a single repository, and leverage powerful records management controls to comply with policies and simplify the disposal of documents. File archiving provides a reliable foundation for your evolving file storage requirements, reducing future integration costs and protecting your investment in existing technology.Market Trends:
– Rising Demand for High-Efficiency Low-Cost Storage for Data RetentionMarket Drivers:
– File Archiving Software Offers Speed Access To Critical Files is the Major Driving Factor for the Market
– Growing Digitalization and Technological Upgadation in End-use IndustryMarket Opportunities:
– Complete Solution for Archiving Email, Files and Lync IM Conversations is Creates Opportunity for MarketThe Global File Archiving Software Market segments and Market Data Break Down are illuminated below:
by Type (Content Types (Email, Database, Social media, Instant messaging, Web, Mobile communication, and Others), Services (Consulting, System Integration, Training, Support, and Maintenance)), Organization Size (Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Large Enterprises, Other), End Use Industry (BFSI, Retail and eCommerce, Government and Defense, Education and Research, Manufacturing, Media and Entertainment, Healthcare and Pharmaceutical, IT and Telecommunications, Energy and Utilities, Others (Legal, Electronics, Automotive, Construction, Transportation and Logistics, Travel and Hospitality, and Food and Beverages)), Deployment (Cloud-based, On-premises), Pricing Type (Monthly Subscription, Annual Subscription, One-Time License)This research report represents a 360-degree overview of the competitive landscape of the Global File Archiving Software Market. Furthermore, it offers massive data relating to recent trends, technological, advancements, tools, and methodologies. The research report analyzes the Global File Archiving Software Market in a detailed and concise manner for better insights into the businesses.Regions Covered in the File Archiving Software Market:
– The Middle East and Africa (South Africa, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, Egypt, etc.)
– North America (United States, Mexico & Canada)
– South America (Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, Colombia, etc.)
– Europe (Turkey, Spain, Turkey, Netherlands Denmark, Belgium, Switzerland, Germany, Russia UK, Italy, France, etc.)
– Asia-Pacific (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Vietnam, China, Malaysia, Japan, Philippines, Korea, Thailand, India, Indonesia, and Australia).Enquire for customization in Report @ https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/enquiry-before-buy/100305-global-file-archiving-software-marketThe research study has taken the help of graphical presentation techniques such as infographics, charts, tables, and pictures. It provides guidelines for both established players and new entrants in the Global File Archiving Software Market.The detailed elaboration of the Global File Archiving Software Market has been provided by applying industry analysis techniques such as SWOT and Porter’s five-technique. Collectively, this research report offers a reliable evaluation of the global market to present the overall framework of businesses.Attractions of the File Archiving Software Market Report:
– The report provides granular level information about the market size, regional market share, historic market (2015-2020) and forecast (2021-2026)
– The report covers in-detail insights about the competitor’s overview, company share analysis, key market developments, and their key strategies
– The report outlines drivers, restraints, unmet needs, and trends that are currently affecting the market
– The report tracks recent innovations, key developments and start-up’s details that are actively working in the market
– The report provides plethora of information about market entry strategies, regulatory framework and reimbursement scenarioGet 10% – 25% Discount on The Report @ https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/request-discount/100305-global-file-archiving-software-marketKey Points Covered in the Table of Content:
Chapter 1 to explain Introduction, market review, market risk and opportunities, market driving force, product scope of File Archiving Software Market;
Chapter 2 to inspect the leading manufacturers (Cost Structure, Raw Material) with sales Analysis, revenue Analysis, and price Analysis of File Archiving Software Market;
Chapter 3 to show the focused circumstance among the best producers, with deals, income, and File Archiving Software market share 2020;
Chapter 4 to display the regional analysis of Global File Archiving Software Market with revenue and sales of an industry, from 2021 to 2026;
Chapter 5, 6, 7 to analyze the key countries (United States, China, Europe, Japan, Korea & Taiwan), with sales, revenue and market share in key regions;
Chapter 8 and 9 to exhibit International and Regional Marketing Type Analysis, Supply Chain Analysis, Trade Type Analysis;
Chapter 10 and 11 to analyze the market by product type and application/end users (industry sales, share, and growth rate) from 2021 to 2026
Chapter 12 to show File Archiving Software Market forecast by regions, forecast by type and forecast by application with revenue and sales, from 2021 to 2026;
Chapter 13, 14 & 15 to specify Research Findings and Conclusion, Appendix, methodology and data source of File Archiving Software market buyers, merchants, dealers, sales channel.Browse for Full Report at @: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/reports/100305-global-file-archiving-software-marketFile Archiving Software Market research provides answers to the following key questions:
? What is the expected growth rate of the File Archiving Software Market?
? What will be the File Archiving Software Market size for the forecast period, 2021 – 2026?
? What are the main driving forces responsible for changing the File Archiving Software Market trajectory?
? Who are the big suppliers that dominate the File Archiving Software Market across different regions? Which are their wins to stay ahead in the competition?
? What are the File Archiving Software Market trends business owners can rely upon in the coming years?
? What are the threats and challenges expected to restrict the progress of the File Archiving Software Market across different countries?Contact US:
Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)
AMA Research & Media LLP
Unit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJ
New Jersey USA – 08837
Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218
sales@advancemarketanalytics.comFor more information on this press release visit: http://www.sbwire.com/press-releases/file-archiving-software-market-to-witness-massive-growth-by-veritas-barracuda-smarsh-1343866.htmMedia Relations ContactNidhi BhavsarPR & Marketing Managersales@advancemarketanalytics.comTelephone: 1-206-317-1218Email: Click to Email Nidhi BhavsarWeb: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com
Read More

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Microsoft

Market Veteran Raoul Pal Predicts Ethereum Comeback Against Bitcoin with Donald Trump’s Victory

Crypto market expert Raoul Pal believes Trump could create a more favorable regulatory environment, which might help Ethereum outperform Bitcoin. Pal compares Ethereum to Microsoft in its early days, saying its reliability and widespread adoption make it a top choice for traditional finance institutions. Pal acknowledges that while Ethereum has strengths…

Published 1 week ago in
Market Veteran Raoul Pal Predicts Ethereum Comeback Against Bitcoin with Donald Trump’s Victory

Crypto market expert Raoul Pal believes Trump could create a more favorable regulatory environment, which might help Ethereum outperform Bitcoin.
Pal compares Ethereum to Microsoft in its early days, saying its reliability and widespread adoption make it a top choice for traditional finance institutions.
Pal acknowledges that while Ethereum has strengths…
Read More

Continue Reading
Microsoft

Microsoft’s decision on Bitcoin could trigger shareholder lawsuit

Key Takeaways Microsoft shareholders will vote in December on a proposal driven by the NCPPR regarding Bitcoin investment. NCPPR warns that Microsoft’s decision not to invest in Bitcoin could lead to shareholder litigation if Bitcoin’s value rises. Share this article Microsoft shareholders will vote in December on whether the company should assess investing in Bitcoin

Published 2 weeks ago in
Microsoft’s decision on Bitcoin could trigger shareholder lawsuit

Key Takeaways

  • Microsoft shareholders will vote in December on a proposal driven by the NCPPR regarding Bitcoin investment.
  • NCPPR warns that Microsoft’s decision not to invest in Bitcoin could lead to shareholder litigation if Bitcoin’s value rises.

Share this article

Microsoft shareholders will vote in December on whether the company should assess investing in Bitcoin, a proposal driven by the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR).

According to a report by Cointelegraph, the NCPPR warns that Microsoft could face shareholder litigation if it decides against Bitcoin investment and the digital asset’s value subsequently rises.

“If Microsoft publicly decides it’s not in shareholders’ best interest to buy Bitcoin, and then Bitcoin’s value rises, shareholders may have grounds to sue,” Ethan Peck, deputy director of NCPPR’s Free Enterprise Project, told Cointelegraph.

Microsoft’s board has recommended shareholders vote against the proposal, stating they already evaluate a “wide range of investable assets,” including Bitcoin.

In its proposal to Microsoft, the NCPPR highlighted MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin investment strategy, noting that it has outperformed Microsoft by over 300% this year despite conducting a fraction of Microsoft’s business volume.

The research center also highlighted increasing institutional adoption through spot Bitcoin ETFs.

In October alone, BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF reportedly acquired $4.6 billion in Bitcoin, bringing the ETF’s total valuation to $31 billion, according to data from Farside Investors and Arkham.

Collectively, Bitcoin ETFs now hold over $72 billion in market cap, underscoring the growing interest from institutions.

Share this article

?xml>
Read More

Continue Reading
Microsoft

With Decentralized AI and Tokenized Ownership, We Can Fight ‘The Six’

Opinion Share Share this article Copy link X icon X (Twitter) LinkedIn Facebook Email With Decentralized AI and Tokenized Ownership, We Can Fight ‘The Six’ Orthodox venture capital will never provide the resources for decentralized AI to take on Microsoft, Alphabet, Apple, et al. The only way is to supplant equity financing with user-owned, token-based

Published 4 weeks ago in
With Decentralized AI and Tokenized Ownership, We Can Fight ‘The Six’
Opinion

Share this article

X iconX (Twitter)LinkedInFacebookEmail

With Decentralized AI and Tokenized Ownership, We Can Fight ‘The Six’

Orthodox venture capital will never provide the resources for decentralized AI to take on Microsoft, Alphabet, Apple, et al. The only way is to supplant equity financing with user-owned, token-based systems, says Michael J. Casey, Chairman of The Decentralized AI Society.

By Michael J. Casey|Edited by Benjamin Schiller
Updated Nov 1, 2024, 7:20 p.m. Published Nov 1, 2024, 7:16 p.m.
(Pixabay)

The past two days’ share price moves for the six most heavily capitalized companies in the U.S. tell you all you need to know about why we must urgently decentralize the artificial intelligence economy.

The first headlines were that the third-quarter profits and revenue from Microsoft, Alphabet, Apple, Meta and Amazon all beat or met expectations. Yet, with the exception of Amazon’s on Friday, Big Tech’s shares all sold off in response to their earnings announcements, dragging down with them chip-maker Nvidia, the sixth member of the group, whose quarterly reporting is scheduled a month later.

Story continues below
Don’t miss another story.Subscribe to the The Node Newsletter today.See all newsletters

By signing up, you will receive emails about CoinDesk products and you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

What spooked investors were some daunting capital expenditure numbers on AI computing power and model development. Alphabet, for one, said it did $13 billion in capex last quarter and expects to do the same in this one while Meta upped its full-year projected spending to $38-40 billion. The giants are in a spending war as each tries to outrace the others toward AI supremacy. Each one of them stands to lose profit margins if it gets out of control.

Let’s be clear: between them, The Six are booking $1.8 trillion in annual revenues, a number that would put their combined inflows in 10th place of global country rankings if we viewed them as a proxy for national GDP – just behind the gross output of Brazil’s 220 million people. Meanwhile, The Six have a combined market capitalization of $15 trillion, capturing an astounding one third of the entire S&P 500 index. Despite – or perhaps because of – this unprecedented scorecard, these companies are relentlessly competing for world domination. Doing what great American companies have always done, they’re unleashing a competitive instinct that, in a normal capitalist economy of diversified goods and services, is the core driver of technological progress.

So, don’t worry about The Six. Worry about us. Because our problem amid the dizzying advance of AI is definitely not one of a shortfall in technological progress. It’s that this particular form of technological progress comes with risks to human autonomy and safety. And to mitigate them, the question of who controls AI’s development and whether their incentives are aligned with the broadest base of humanity is fundamental.

Just as was the case for Alphabet’s Google, Meta’s Facebook and Amazon’s marketplace, the development of these six companies’ large language models (LLMs) and other AI machinery is occurring within closed, black-box systems.They’ve ingested the troves of data we all unwittingly poured into internet sites, and have built highly complex codebases into which no one has visibility. Between them, they dominate all layers of the AI stack: the storage (Amazon Web Services), the chips for computation (Nvidia), the AI models (Microsoft, with its investment in Open AI), the data (Alphabet and Meta) and the devices we use to interact with AI services (Apple). They might be competing with each other, but they form a vertically diversified oligopoly. Or rather, given the undeniable power that their technology can wield over people’s lives, they’re an oligarchy. Indeed, the secrecy around the means by which they exercise that power is characteristic of most oligarchical dictatorships.

Toward the latter phase of the Web2 era, people eventually came to understand Bruce Schneier’s memorable observation that we are not the internet platforms’ customers; we are their products. With that awareness, we’re now also finally opening our eyes to how these companies have long been incentivized to modify people’s behavior in unhealthy ways to maximize shareholder returns. It is no longer controversial to talk of the psychological harm done by the algorithms of Facebook, YouTube, Tik Tok and their ilk, which were blatantly designed to exploit dopamine releases to encourage continued, addictive engagement.

When Frank McCourt and I published Our Biggest Fight in March 2024, we were overwhelmed by parents’ horror stories of the harm social media had done to their kids. And then a Harris Poll coordinated by NYU Professor Johathan Haidt found that young people are just as concerned: nearly half of Gen Z wishes that TikTok and X (Twitter) never existed, even as 83% of the same cohort said they spend four hours a day or more on social media.

So, if we now know of the harms, why on earth would we extend the same oligopolistic control structure into the AI era? AI will put the Web2 oligopoly on steroids.

This is why I believe the creation of distributed, collectively owned open-source AI is a vitally important use case for Web3 and blockchain technology. It’s the only way to avoid the problem of misaligned incentives.

Sure, there are technical challenges, such as the latency that, for now, makes distributed machine learning inefficient, the capacity limits of on-chain data, or the privacy risks inherent to public blockchains. But innovators are already hard at work on outside-the-box solutions to these problems, motivated by the huge economic and reputational payoff promised by overcoming them. And when they do, the inherent information advantages enjoyed by open systems over closed systems will give decentralized AI a fighting chance. Achieve that, and “DeAI” will represent not only the right moral path but also the economic winner.

Here’s the rub: time is not on our side. And the fight is heavily lopsided. As cited above, The Six have an unprecedented $15 trillion war chest. In the 2000s, Facebook and Google learned that their high-value share prices gave them a currency with which to relentlessly acquire startups that could either enhance or threaten their dominance. Now, The Six have even greater capacity to buy up and integrate whatever breakthroughs in AI are coming, be it in independent AI agents or more efficient systems of compute. Their financial clout means that the most important innovations, those that offer the best hope for a more decentralized AI economy, are at risk of being subsumed into their centralized system. Remember, they’re competing with each other and are incentivized to do whatever it takes to win.

To fight their centralized approach, we must flip the paradigm. Orthodox venture capital will never provide anywhere near enough resources for decentralized competitors to take on the big guys. The only way is to supplant equity financing models with full user-owned, token-based systems. In the future, when your home devices provide the compute and deliver your privacy-preserved data into open-source models that are proven to act in your interests, you will earn tokens for that work. And, with that currency, you will pay for all the cool services delivered by your personal AI agent. It’s a new, distributed financing and payments system for a new, decentralized AI economy. It is the only way.

Yet, to succeed, the crypto and blockchain industry has to reimagine itself. If startup founders see DeAI merely as a new source of get-rich-quick token-pump opportunities, or if the leaders of the Layer 1 platforms now turning to the field are fixated more on applications that temporarily drive up the dollar value of their tribe’s cryptocurrency rather than on those that address real, economy-wide problems, this movement will fail. To win this fight, this industry must become more interoperable. It must become more collaborative.

This is not to say we should squash the competitive instincts that are vital to innovation. But it is to acknowledge a need for better cross-industry organization. Through collaborative bodies such as the new Decentralized AI Society, different stakeholders can work with each other to advance common interests around standards, reference architectures, taxonomies, policy objectives and open-source, cross-chain protocols that everyone can use regardless of the token they hold. We’re not building to pump our bags or take our token “to the moon.” We’re building to create a new decentralized AI economy for the benefit of all humanity.

Come join the fight.

Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.

Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.

Opinion
Michael J. Casey

Michael J. Casey is Chairman of The Decentralized AI Society, former Chief Content Officer at CoinDesk and co-author of Our Biggest Fight: Reclaiming Liberty, Humanity, and Dignity in the Digital Age. Previously, Casey was the CEO of Streambed Media, a company he cofounded to develop provenance data for digital content. He was also a senior advisor at MIT Media Labs’s Digital Currency Initiative and a senior lecturer at MIT Sloan School of Management. Prior to joining MIT, Casey spent 18 years at The Wall Street Journal, where his last position was as a senior columnist covering global economic affairs.

Casey has authored five books, including “The Age of Cryptocurrency: How Bitcoin and Digital Money are Challenging the Global Economic Order” and “The Truth Machine: The Blockchain and the Future of Everything,” both co-authored with Paul Vigna.

Upon joining CoinDesk full time, Casey resigned from a variety of paid advisory positions. He maintains unpaid posts as an advisor to not-for-profit organizations, including MIT Media Lab’s Digital Currency Initiative and The Deep Trust Alliance. He is a shareholder and non-executive chairman of Streambed Media.

Casey owns bitcoin.

X icon

Michael J. Casey

!–>
Read More

Continue Reading
Microsoft

Metaplanet Exceeds 1,000 Bitcoin Holdings After Latest Purchase

TLDR Metaplanet purchased 156 additional BTC, bringing total holdings above 1,000 BTC Company stock rose 6.06% following the announcement Metaplanet achieved 116% Bitcoin yield in October 2023 Company raised 10 billion Yen through Stock Acquisition Rights Microsoft considering Bitcoin investment, subject to shareholder approval Metaplanet, Asia’s largest corporate Bitcoin holder…

Published 1 month ago in
Metaplanet Exceeds 1,000 Bitcoin Holdings After Latest Purchase

TLDR Metaplanet purchased 156 additional BTC, bringing total holdings above 1,000 BTC Company stock rose 6.06% following the announcement Metaplanet achieved 116% Bitcoin yield in October 2023 Company raised 10 billion Yen through Stock Acquisition Rights Microsoft considering Bitcoin investment, subject to shareholder approval Metaplanet, Asia’s largest corporate Bitcoin holder…
Read More

Continue Reading