Internet Security

SEC lacks grounds against ETH and valid reasons to reject Ethereum Spot ETF: Coinbase CLO

Share this article URL Copied

Share this article

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is under fire for its perceived lack of clarity regarding Ethereum (ETH). In a recent post on X, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, challenged the SEC’s position, arguing that the SEC doesn’t have sufficient reasons to classify ETH as a security nor justifiable reasons to reject a spot Ethereum exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Grewal pointed to several key points about Ethereum, including the widespread adoption of ETH. According to him, classifying ETH as a security potentially impacts several US citizens.

The core argument is that “ETH is a commodity, not a security.” Grewal believes Ethereum should not be classified as a security, which would put it under stricter SEC regulations.

In support of his argument, Grewal referenced statements from former SEC officials. He highlighted comments by William Hinman, the SEC’s former Director of Corporation Finance, who previously declared, “ETH is not a security.” Grewal also mentioned that SEC Chair Gary Gensler himself, before his appointment, had publicly stated that “ETH is not a security.”

Grewal added that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and federal courts have consistently classified ETH as a commodity. According to him, ETH futures contracts traded on CFTC-regulated exchanges demonstrate established regulatory acceptance of ETH as a commodity.

This raises concerns about a potential clash between the SEC and the CFTC. Some analysts have previously warned that if the SEC classifies ETH as a security, it could directly contradict the CFTC’s view.

Grewal further argued that the Howey Test, a legal framework used to identify investment contracts, doesn’t apply to determining ETH’s status as a commodity. He believes that even with the merge, Ethereum’s major update that transitioned the network to proof-of-stake, ETH wouldn’t meet the criteria of an investment contract under the Howey Test.

Despite the SEC’s uncertain stance on ETH, Grewal believes the SEC has no valid reason to reject applications for spot Ethereum ETFs.

News of a probe into the Ethereum Foundation by an undisclosed “state authority” has cast a shadow over the already uncertain fate of spot Ethereum ETFs. The legal status of ETH has been a point of contention, and this investigation could further complicate the SEC’s decision on several pending ETF applications.

Details regarding the SEC’s investigation into the Ethereum Foundation remain unclear. It’s unknown whether the SEC is the unnamed agency involved, and even if it is, the purpose of the investigation remains unconfirmed.

Coinbase’s Paul Grewal isn’t alone in advocating Ethereum’s classification as a commodity. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently argued in a post that the SEC is “losing badly” in court battles regarding Ethereum and falling behind international regulatory standards.

Spot Ethereum ETFs face continued delays

The SEC has delayed its decision on several spot Ethereum ETFs, including Grayscale’s Ethereum Futures Trust ETF, which was pushed back again on Friday. Other major issuers, such as ARK Invest, VanEck, BlackRock, and Fidelity, are also waiting for the SEC’s green light on their proposed Ethereum ETFs.

Bloomberg ETF analysts’ latest update paints a grim picture for hopeful investors awaiting approval of spot Ethereum ETFs. Their revised estimates peg the chance of a May approval at a meager 35%, significantly lower than their predictions for spot Bitcoin ETF approval.

Adding to the uncertainty, two US senators sent a letter to SEC Chair Gary Gensler earlier this month urging him to deny new crypto ETFs. Meanwhile, Gensler remains tight-lipped on the topic.

Share this article

Share this article

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is under fire for its perceived lack of clarity regarding Ethereum (ETH). In a recent post on X, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, Paul Grewal, challenged the SEC’s position, arguing that the SEC doesn’t have sufficient reasons to classify ETH as a security nor justifiable reasons to reject a spot Ethereum exchange-traded fund (ETF).

Grewal pointed to several key points about Ethereum, including the widespread adoption of ETH. According to him, classifying ETH as a security potentially impacts several US citizens.

The core argument is that “ETH is a commodity, not a security.” Grewal believes Ethereum should not be classified as a security, which would put it under stricter SEC regulations.

In support of his argument, Grewal referenced statements from former SEC officials. He highlighted comments by William Hinman, the SEC’s former Director of Corporation Finance, who previously declared, “ETH is not a security.” Grewal also mentioned that SEC Chair Gary Gensler himself, before his appointment, had publicly stated that “ETH is not a security.”

Grewal added that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and federal courts have consistently classified ETH as a commodity. According to him, ETH futures contracts traded on CFTC-regulated exchanges demonstrate established regulatory acceptance of ETH as a commodity.

This raises concerns about a potential clash between the SEC and the CFTC. Some analysts have previously warned that if the SEC classifies ETH as a security, it could directly contradict the CFTC’s view.

Grewal further argued that the Howey Test, a legal framework used to identify investment contracts, doesn’t apply to determining ETH’s status as a commodity. He believes that even with the merge, Ethereum’s major update that transitioned the network to proof-of-stake, ETH wouldn’t meet the criteria of an investment contract under the Howey Test.

Despite the SEC’s uncertain stance on ETH, Grewal believes the SEC has no valid reason to reject applications for spot Ethereum ETFs.

News of a probe into the Ethereum Foundation by an undisclosed “state authority” has cast a shadow over the already uncertain fate of spot Ethereum ETFs. The legal status of ETH has been a point of contention, and this investigation could further complicate the SEC’s decision on several pending ETF applications.

Details regarding the SEC’s investigation into the Ethereum Foundation remain unclear. It’s unknown whether the SEC is the unnamed agency involved, and even if it is, the purpose of the investigation remains unconfirmed.

Coinbase’s Paul Grewal isn’t alone in advocating Ethereum’s classification as a commodity. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse recently argued in a post that the SEC is “losing badly” in court battles regarding Ethereum and falling behind international regulatory standards.

Spot Ethereum ETFs face continued delays

The SEC has delayed its decision on several spot Ethereum ETFs, including Grayscale’s Ethereum Futures Trust ETF, which was pushed back again

?xml>

?xml>?xml>?xml>
Read More

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Internet Security

Oregon passes bill to establish legal control standards for digital assets

Key Takeaways Oregon passed Senate Bill 167 to update commercial laws and include digital assets in the UCC. The new law allows digital assets to be used as collateral and recognizes electronic records and signatures. Share this article Oregon has enacted Senate Bill 167, updating the state’s commercial laws to incorporate digital assets into the

Key Takeaways

  • Oregon passed Senate Bill 167 to update commercial laws and include digital assets in the UCC.
  • The new law allows digital assets to be used as collateral and recognizes electronic records and signatures.

Share this article

Oregon has enacted Senate Bill 167, updating the state’s commercial laws to incorporate digital assets into the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).

The legislation, signed by Governor Tina Kotek on May 7, introduces UCC Article 12, which creates a legal framework for digital assets including crypto assets, tokenized records, and electronic money.

The bill amends Article 9 to allow digital assets to be used as collateral in secured transactions. It also updates several UCC articles to recognize electronic records, signatures, and hybrid transactions to support digital commerce.

The new law includes transitional provisions that maintain the validity of transactions made before the act’s effective date and provides a one-year period for existing security interests to comply with the new regulations.

Before these changes, there was legal uncertainty about how digital assets fit into existing commercial laws, especially when used as collateral or transferred between parties. The UCC amendments clarify how rights in these assets can be legally controlled, perfected, and enforced.

Apart from SB 167, House Bill 2071 is another crypto-related bill introduced in Oregon.

This proposed legislation focuses on blockchain and digital asset rights. It is aimed at protecting and promoting the use of Bitcoin and other digital assets in the state by limiting regulatory barriers and clarifying the legal framework for blockchain-based activities.

Some of the highlights of the bill include a prohibition on state and local governments from restricting or impairing a person’s ability to accept digital assets as payment for lawful goods and services, as well as the right to conduct peer-to-peer transactions via blockchain or digital asset networks.

The bill is still in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet advanced to a vote in either the House or the Senate.

Unlike most US states, Oregon lawmakers have not proposed any bill to create a state Bitcoin reserve as of now.

Share this article

?xml>
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

White House rejects parts of Trump advisers’ sovereign wealth fund proposal

Key Takeaways The White House has rejected parts of a sovereign wealth fund proposal created by Trump’s advisers. The details of the sovereign wealth fund are still under debate with no final decisions announced yet. Share this article The White House has opposed certain elements of a sovereign wealth fund proposal developed by Treasury Secretary

Key Takeaways

  • The White House has rejected parts of a sovereign wealth fund proposal created by Trump’s advisers.
  • The details of the sovereign wealth fund are still under debate with no final decisions announced yet.

Share this article

The White House has opposed certain elements of a sovereign wealth fund proposal developed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick at President Trump’s request, according to a new report from CBS News.

The plan, reportedly delivered by early May, follows Trump’s February executive order directing the Treasury and Commerce departments to develop a framework for a US sovereign wealth fund within 90 days.

The order fueled speculation that the fund might be used to acquire Bitcoin on behalf of the US government.

However, at the time, Bessent and Lutnick said that the fund would indeed focus on warrants, equity, and other non-crypto investments. Still, David Sacks, Trump’s crypto czar, indicated that Bitcoin could be included in the fund’s portfolio.

That no longer appears to be the case after Trump signed a separate executive order establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve and a digital asset stockpile on March 6, which suggests a standalone approach to crypto holdings.

There were also rumors that the fund might be financed through tariffs and other revenue sources despite ongoing budget deficits. But Lutnick later clarified that tariffs would not be used to support the sovereign wealth fund.

According to the CBS News report, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said the Treasury and Commerce Departments have developed plans in response to Trump’s directive, but no final decisions have been made.

The administration, Desai added, continues to view the initiative as part of its broader effort to safeguard national and economic security.

Details of the fund’s structure and purpose remain under discussion, with no formal announcement expected in the near term.

Sources say Trump has not yet decided how the fund’s proceeds would be used, though he has previously floated the idea of it taking a stake in TikTok, which faces a potential US ban unless ByteDance divests.

Regarding the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and the Digital Asset Stockpile, Bessent and Lutnick are also tasked with outlining operational guidelines, custody frameworks, and acquisition strategies. These plans are expected to remain separate from the sovereign wealth fund initiative and are designed to be budget-neutral.

Share this article

?xml>?xml>?xml>
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Crypto Security Breach at Lido DAO Triggers Governance Response

TLDR Lido DAO started an emergency vote to rotate a compromised Chorus One oracle The exploit drained ETH balance and likely resulted from a hot wallet private key leak The issue is restricted to one oracle and is not system-wide Cybersecurity remains a critical issue for cryptocurrency and DeFi Over $2 billion in crypto was

TLDR Lido DAO started an emergency vote to rotate a compromised Chorus One oracle The exploit drained ETH balance and likely resulted from a hot wallet private key leak The issue is restricted to one oracle and is not system-wide Cybersecurity remains a critical issue for cryptocurrency and DeFi Over $2 billion in crypto was […]
The post Crypto Security Breach at Lido DAO Triggers Governance Response appeared first on Blockonomi…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

CZ Shares Security Warning After Ledger Discord Hack Exposes User Data

Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder and former CEO of Binance, shared a security warning after receiving a message regarding a hack of Ledger’s Discord admin account, where a scammer falsely claimed a security flaw and urged users to enter their recovery phrases on a phishing site. Zhao highlighted two critical lessons: the necessity of never sharing

Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder and former CEO of Binance, shared a security warning after receiving a message regarding a hack of Ledger’s Discord admin account, where a scammer falsely claimed a security flaw and urged users to enter their recovery phrases on a phishing site. Zhao highlighted two critical lessons: the necessity of never sharing [……
Read More

Continue Reading