Internet Security

EU gets serious on privacy, but too many companies ignore the risk

Check out all the on-demand sessions from the Intelligent Security Summit here. If you ask most tech workers the difference between security and privacy, they probably won’t be able to tell you the difference — unless their main job is working on one of those teams. Given how much of our life is now online,…

Check out all the on-demand sessions from the Intelligent Security Summit here.


If you ask most tech workers the difference between security and privacy, they probably won’t be able to tell you the difference — unless their main job is working on one of those teams. Given how much of our life is now online, this is a problem that can lead to corporate liability and multimillion-dollar fines, especially from European regulators. With this increased focus, what’s the difference between security and privacy, and how should employees think about these issues? 

To start, let’s look at Twitter’s announcement this summer that a hacker had been in its system for more than six months, and was offering to sell user data from 5.4 million accounts. (In 2020 a Florida teen was also charged with taking over accounts). Hackers breaching Twitter’s system pose a security problem. But since these hackers may have had access to millions or billions of records, that’s also a privacy problem.  

This summer, Meta was fined $403 million by Ireland’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) authority. Last year, European regulators fined Amazon $888 million. This is a big problem for major platforms, but it can hit almost any company today: California recently fined Sepora $1.2 million for violating the CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act). 

If we want to reduce the impact of fines and breaches, we need software companies to focus on privacy as much as security, and make sure their employees know the difference. If you go to the doctor, your doctor knows exactly what HIPAA regulations allow them to disclose. Any trucker on the road knows exactly how many hours they can drive based on DoT Hours of Service regulations. But if you ask tech workers what they can and can’t do under CCPA, most may not even recognize the acronym. 

Event

Intelligent Security Summit On-Demand

Learn the critical role of AI & ML in cybersecurity and industry specific case studies. Watch on-demand sessions today.

Watch Here

Privacy is about creating trust in your organization. It’s about how you handle personal information, and making sure that you’re treating this data responsibly and in line with what consumers would expect you to do. 

TL;DR on GDPR

GDPR guidelines call for data to be stored in a manner that ensures users can request that their information be corrected, deleted as part of the “right to be forgotten,” or acc

Read More

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Internet Security

Oregon passes bill to establish legal control standards for digital assets

Key Takeaways Oregon passed Senate Bill 167 to update commercial laws and include digital assets in the UCC. The new law allows digital assets to be used as collateral and recognizes electronic records and signatures. Share this article Oregon has enacted Senate Bill 167, updating the state’s commercial laws to incorporate digital assets into the

Key Takeaways

  • Oregon passed Senate Bill 167 to update commercial laws and include digital assets in the UCC.
  • The new law allows digital assets to be used as collateral and recognizes electronic records and signatures.

Share this article

Oregon has enacted Senate Bill 167, updating the state’s commercial laws to incorporate digital assets into the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).

The legislation, signed by Governor Tina Kotek on May 7, introduces UCC Article 12, which creates a legal framework for digital assets including crypto assets, tokenized records, and electronic money.

The bill amends Article 9 to allow digital assets to be used as collateral in secured transactions. It also updates several UCC articles to recognize electronic records, signatures, and hybrid transactions to support digital commerce.

The new law includes transitional provisions that maintain the validity of transactions made before the act’s effective date and provides a one-year period for existing security interests to comply with the new regulations.

Before these changes, there was legal uncertainty about how digital assets fit into existing commercial laws, especially when used as collateral or transferred between parties. The UCC amendments clarify how rights in these assets can be legally controlled, perfected, and enforced.

Apart from SB 167, House Bill 2071 is another crypto-related bill introduced in Oregon.

This proposed legislation focuses on blockchain and digital asset rights. It is aimed at protecting and promoting the use of Bitcoin and other digital assets in the state by limiting regulatory barriers and clarifying the legal framework for blockchain-based activities.

Some of the highlights of the bill include a prohibition on state and local governments from restricting or impairing a person’s ability to accept digital assets as payment for lawful goods and services, as well as the right to conduct peer-to-peer transactions via blockchain or digital asset networks.

The bill is still in the early stages of the legislative process and has not yet advanced to a vote in either the House or the Senate.

Unlike most US states, Oregon lawmakers have not proposed any bill to create a state Bitcoin reserve as of now.

Share this article

?xml>
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

White House rejects parts of Trump advisers’ sovereign wealth fund proposal

Key Takeaways The White House has rejected parts of a sovereign wealth fund proposal created by Trump’s advisers. The details of the sovereign wealth fund are still under debate with no final decisions announced yet. Share this article The White House has opposed certain elements of a sovereign wealth fund proposal developed by Treasury Secretary

Key Takeaways

  • The White House has rejected parts of a sovereign wealth fund proposal created by Trump’s advisers.
  • The details of the sovereign wealth fund are still under debate with no final decisions announced yet.

Share this article

The White House has opposed certain elements of a sovereign wealth fund proposal developed by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick at President Trump’s request, according to a new report from CBS News.

The plan, reportedly delivered by early May, follows Trump’s February executive order directing the Treasury and Commerce departments to develop a framework for a US sovereign wealth fund within 90 days.

The order fueled speculation that the fund might be used to acquire Bitcoin on behalf of the US government.

However, at the time, Bessent and Lutnick said that the fund would indeed focus on warrants, equity, and other non-crypto investments. Still, David Sacks, Trump’s crypto czar, indicated that Bitcoin could be included in the fund’s portfolio.

That no longer appears to be the case after Trump signed a separate executive order establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve and a digital asset stockpile on March 6, which suggests a standalone approach to crypto holdings.

There were also rumors that the fund might be financed through tariffs and other revenue sources despite ongoing budget deficits. But Lutnick later clarified that tariffs would not be used to support the sovereign wealth fund.

According to the CBS News report, White House spokesperson Kush Desai said the Treasury and Commerce Departments have developed plans in response to Trump’s directive, but no final decisions have been made.

The administration, Desai added, continues to view the initiative as part of its broader effort to safeguard national and economic security.

Details of the fund’s structure and purpose remain under discussion, with no formal announcement expected in the near term.

Sources say Trump has not yet decided how the fund’s proceeds would be used, though he has previously floated the idea of it taking a stake in TikTok, which faces a potential US ban unless ByteDance divests.

Regarding the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and the Digital Asset Stockpile, Bessent and Lutnick are also tasked with outlining operational guidelines, custody frameworks, and acquisition strategies. These plans are expected to remain separate from the sovereign wealth fund initiative and are designed to be budget-neutral.

Share this article

?xml>?xml>?xml>
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Crypto Security Breach at Lido DAO Triggers Governance Response

TLDR Lido DAO started an emergency vote to rotate a compromised Chorus One oracle The exploit drained ETH balance and likely resulted from a hot wallet private key leak The issue is restricted to one oracle and is not system-wide Cybersecurity remains a critical issue for cryptocurrency and DeFi Over $2 billion in crypto was

TLDR Lido DAO started an emergency vote to rotate a compromised Chorus One oracle The exploit drained ETH balance and likely resulted from a hot wallet private key leak The issue is restricted to one oracle and is not system-wide Cybersecurity remains a critical issue for cryptocurrency and DeFi Over $2 billion in crypto was […]
The post Crypto Security Breach at Lido DAO Triggers Governance Response appeared first on Blockonomi…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

CZ Shares Security Warning After Ledger Discord Hack Exposes User Data

Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder and former CEO of Binance, shared a security warning after receiving a message regarding a hack of Ledger’s Discord admin account, where a scammer falsely claimed a security flaw and urged users to enter their recovery phrases on a phishing site. Zhao highlighted two critical lessons: the necessity of never sharing

Changpeng Zhao (CZ), founder and former CEO of Binance, shared a security warning after receiving a message regarding a hack of Ledger’s Discord admin account, where a scammer falsely claimed a security flaw and urged users to enter their recovery phrases on a phishing site. Zhao highlighted two critical lessons: the necessity of never sharing [……
Read More

Continue Reading