Internet Security

John Bolton Calls on Marco Rubio to Resign After Zelensky White House Spat

CLOSE X By Maya Mehrara is a News Reporter at Newsweek based in London, U.K.. Her focus is reporting on international news. She has covered Ukraine, Russia, immigration issues, and the revolution in Iran. Maya joined Newsweek in 2024 from the Londoners and had previously written for MyLondon, the Camden New Journal, BUST Magazine, and

John Bolton, a former national security adviser for President Donald Trump, called on Secretary of State Marco Rubio to resign following Trump’s tense meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Newsweek contacted the U.S. Department of State for comment via email outside business hours.

Why It Matters

On February 28, Trump and Zelensky met in the White House, where they discussed pursuing a ceasefire deal in the Russia-Ukraine war and U.S. security guarantees for Kyiv. While Trump has said he trusts Russian President Vladimir Putin to respect a ceasefire, Zelensky expressed skepticism during their discussion, which ultimately erupted into a heated exchange.

Bolton’s call for Rubio to resign underscores the concern some have over Washington’s evolving relationship with Moscow.

Former National Security Advisor John Bolton
Former national security adviser John Bolton at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Oxon Hill, Maryland, on February 22, 2018.

Michael Brochstein/Associated Press

What To Know

Speaking to MSNBC’s Nicole Wallace on Friday about Trump’s comments, Bolton said, “This is the point, when somebody does 180 degrees from understanding American allies to backing America’s adversaries, that you resign.”

He then called on Rubio and Mike Waltz, the national security adviser, to resign, adding: “This is really the time to do it. If they don’t get out now, I think their reputations will suffer for a long, long time, and that would be sad because their record in believing in a strong American national security policy is very good up until now.”

After Friday’s meeting between Trump and Zelensky, the Ukrainian president was asked to leave the White House, with Trump later writing on social media, “I have determined that President Zelenskyy is not ready for Peace.”

Social media users have highlighted Rubio’s role in the peace talks, commenting on his body language during Trump’s conversation with Zelensky. Images of Rubio slouching with his hands clasped and appearing stone-faced quickly circulated online, with some commentators saying he appeared “embarrassed.”

In an interview with CNN after the meeting, Rubio criticized Zelensky, saying, “That wasn’t supposed to be this way, but that’s the path he chose, and I think, frankly, sends his country backwards in regards to achieving peace, which is what President Trump wants at the end of the day.”

He added that the Ukrainian president should apologize for “turning this thing into the fiasco” that it became and “wasting our time for a meeting that was going to end the way it did.”

In August 2015, while serving as a senator and running for president, Rubio told reporters: “Russia is governed today by a gangster. He’s basically an organized crime figure who controls a government and a large territory. There’s no other way to describe Vladimir Putin.”

What People Are Saying

Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Saturday: “Being a peacemaker is not a bad thing. We should be applauding and supporting @POTUS’s efforts to bring about peace.”

Brian Krassenstein, a political commentator, wrote on X: “Marco Rubio, RESIGN!! They will eventually ask you to pull us out of NATO. Get out before it’s too late.”

Rick Wilson, a co-founder of the Lincoln Project, wrote on X: “If Marco Rubio had a shred of honor, and believed in any of values he articulated so passionately when he ran for office, he would resign as Secretary of State. In related news, he will not resign as Secretary of State.”

Kylie Jane Kremer, a former producer for Sean Hannity, wrote on X: “This is so cute! John Bolton thinks SOS Marco Rubio and Advisor Mike Waltz should resign. Bless his warmongering heart.”

What Happens Next

It remains to be seen whether Rubio will respond to Bolton’s call to resign.

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

‘;uncommonKnowledgeItems[0].insertAdjacentHTML(‘afterend’,uncommonKnowledgeContainerHtml);let uncommonKnowledgeContainerElement=document.getElementsByClassName(‘uncommon-knowledge’);let itemsContainerElement=document.getElementById(‘uncommon-knowledge-items-container’);uncommonKnowledgeContainerElement[0].style.display=’block’;uncommonKnowledgeItems.forEach((itemUncommon)=>{document.getElementById(‘uncommon-knowledge-items-container’).insertAdjacentHTML(‘beforeend’,’

‘+itemUncommon.innerHTML+’

‘);itemUncommon.remove()});jQuery(‘.start-slider’).owlCarousel({loop:!1,margin:10,nav:!0,items:1}).on(‘changed.owl.carousel’,function(event){var currentItem=event.item.index;var totalItems=event.item.count;if(currentItem===0){jQuery(‘.owl-prev’).addClass(‘disabled’)}else{jQuery(‘.owl-prev’).removeClass(‘disabled’)}
if(currentItem===totalItems-1){jQuery(‘.owl-next’).addClass(‘disabled’)}else{jQuery(‘.owl-next’).removeClass(‘disabled’)}})}})})

Newsweek Logo

fairness meter

fairness meter

Newsweek is committed to journalism that’s factual and fair.

Hold us accountable and submit your rating of this article on the meter.

Newsweek is committed to journalism that’s factual and fair.

Hold us accountable and submit your rating of this article on the meter.

Click On Meter To Rate This Article

Confirm your selection

Comment on your rating
Share

Read More

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Internet Security

SA Man Charged Over Online Threats to Police Officers | Mirage News

A South Australian man has been charged over alleged online threats toward police officers. The AFP’s National Security Investigations (NSI) team began an investigation in September after South Australia Police referred a series of social media posts for investigation. It’s alleged the posts advocated violence against police and made threats towards a number of senior

A South Australian man has been charged over alleged online threats toward police officers. The AFP’s National Security Investigations (NSI) team began an investigation in September after South Australia Police referred a series of social media posts for investigation. It’s alleged the posts advocated violence against police and made threats towards a number of senior
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Crypto hardware wallets compared for 2026

From touchscreen and QR-code devices to NFC cards and Bitcoin-only models, this guide compares hardware wallets by security, connectivity, usability and recovery options to help users choose the right fit…

From touchscreen and QR-code devices to NFC cards and Bitcoin-only models, this guide compares hardware wallets by security, connectivity, usability and recovery options to help users choose the right fit…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto but few make it central to wealth plans

Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto, but integration stays low. Security, fees and platform complexity emerge as key barriers to adoption. US investors show deepest crypto integration despite lower ownership rates. High-net-worth investors are increasingly buying crypto, but many are still reluctant to make it a major part of their long-term wealth plans


An investor checks rising cryptocurrency charts on a laptop and smartphone with a city skyline visible through the office window.

  • Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto, but integration stays low.
  • Security, fees and platform complexity emerge as key barriers to adoption.
  • US investors show deepest crypto integration despite lower ownership rates.

High-net-worth investors are increasingly buying crypto, but many are still reluctant to make it a major part of their long-term wealth plans, according to a new Nexo survey.

The report found that 67% of affluent investors across the US, UK and Argentina already own crypto. However, security concerns, high fees and complicated platforms are stopping many from using digital assets for retirement planning or replacing traditional investments.

Nexo published its “Future of Digital Wealth 2026” report on September 23 after surveying 1,000 affluent investors. Its new Crypto Integration Index, which measures how deeply crypto is incorporated into investors’ finances, produced an average score of 4.83 out of 10.

Ownership outpaces deeper integration

Nexo said a score near the survey average of 4.83 represents a small, short-horizon crypto position outside retirement planning.

Only 4.7% of surveyed investors scored seven or higher, a level Nexo describes as structurally integrated, where crypto has replaced a traditional asset and forms part of longer-term financial planning.

The report found that just under 20% of respondents expect crypto to become their number-one personal wealth driver over the next decade, ahead of salary, equities and real estate.

More than 40% are already invested in crypto without yet building wealth with it.

“Once an investor gets past the risk perception stage, what’s left is security, fees, and platform user-friendliness and capabilities – the same things we’ve spent years building Nexo to solve,” said Neil Steinhardt, COO, Nexo US.

That’s the gap between owning crypto and actually building wealth with it, and it’s exactly where our platform is designed to meet investors.

Integration also varies by market. Argentina had the highest ownership rate at 74%, but a CII score of 4.62. The US had the lowest ownership at 62%, but the deepest integration with a score of 5.07.

The UK recorded 65% ownership and a CII score of 4.75.

Platform trust becomes the next hurdle

The report said crypto integration peaks among investors aged 35 to 44, with 28% treating digital assets as a core retirement asset.

Investors aged 18 to 25 reported the highest ownership and conviction, with more than 90% holding crypto, but only 2% maintaining a horizon of 10 years or longer.

Among

Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

LIZ PEEK: Can Trump Make the UN Great Again despite its globalist agenda?

close Video Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon condemns the UN for allegedly including Israel in sexual violence blacklist Danny Danon, the Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations (UN), blasts the UN for what he claims is their decision to include Israel in a sexual violence blacklist that also includes Hamas. NEWYou can

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Today, President Trump will address the U.N. General Assembly. As New Yorkers fume over traffic nightmares created by the president and by hordes of visiting diplomats, they may (again) question, as do many Americans, why U.S. taxpayers support this badly managed and scandal-scarred institution. Especially when the U.N. so frequently works against our interests and seems incapable of accomplishing its primary mission.

A new Gallup poll shows that 73% of Americans think the U.N. does a poor job of “maintaining international peace and security,” and 70% say the same about the U.N. “upholding international law” and “protecting human rights.” That’s a lousy report card for an organization that spends roughly $70 billion per year.

Elsewhere in the world, the U.N. scores better, which is not surprising since poor countries, which constitute the majority of members, look to wealthier nations for handouts via the U.N. The nations of Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, are especially keen on the sprawling organization.

WALTZ DELIVERS BLUNT WARNING TO NATIONS DEFYING IRAN SANCTIONS, TOUTS GREENLAND DEAL

Trump heads to UN General Assembly as foreign policy challenges mount Video

How does that wealth transfer happen? One way was described by President Trump’s U.N. Ambassador Mike Waltz in recent testimony before Congress: “The U.N. let countries use peacekeeping missions as cash cows for their militaries. Peacekeepers could bring equipment, park it, never use it, take it home brand new, and get it paid for by the U.N.” Those operations can employ “10,000 to 18,000 soldiers”; the costs, Waltz says, are “quite significant.” He is ending that practice — just one step in reforming the bloated U.N., whose budget has quadrupled over the past 25 years.

Americans have reason for skepticism, given the frequent votes that go against the U.S. or our ally Israel. For thirty-three years in a row, the General Assembly has voted to end our embargo on Cuba, and for decades it has opposed Israel’s attempts to protects its citizens from Palestinian terrorists. Waltz calls the body a “cesspool of antisemitism.”

WALTZ SLAMS FRANCE AFTER STUNNING SOCIAL MEDIA ATTACK ON US AFTER UN VOTE

Not only is the U.N. frequently hostile to the U.S., it is often ridiculous. Most recently, the U.N. voted overwhelmingly to adopt a new map which blows up Africa’s presence on the globe; the U.S. was the sole dissenter. In a memo explaining our outlier vote, Deputy U.S. Representative Yaryna Ferencevych called such resolutions “barnacles on our work here” and wrote: “Instead of focusing on genuine problems of international peace… this body is debating map projects from the 16th century, and their role in promoting reparations and “cognitive justice.”

The U.N. rarely has much real-world impact. Critics might question, for instance, what the U.N. has done to resolve the Russia-Ukraine War, or how it has helped keep the world’s oil flowing through the Strait of Hormuz. The answer in both cases is zero.

Instead, the U.N. is hyper-focused on climate change, gender equality and other issues that may scratch a globalist itch, but appear little related to the cause of peace.

Demonstrators gather outside United Nations General Assembly Video

Meanwhile, the U.N. is going broke. Last year the Economist reported: “On May 5th the U.N. will brief members on a previously unreported $600m (17%) cut to its $3.7bn [administrative] budget aimed at avoiding default this year. It will include a hiring freeze… Yet it may not be enough. A combination of deadbeat members and mad budget rules have led to a liquidity crisis.”

TRUMP BRINGS NEW HEAT TO CONTROVERSIAL UN AGENCY AS ALLEGED HAMAS TIES ENGULF SCORES OF EMPLOYEES

The article goes on to warn that a “leaked memo” suggesting that the Trump administration might cut off funding to the U.N. threatened “a financial crash in the citadel of peace and security.”

The Trump White House has not bankrupted the U.N. by withholding payments. Instead, it appointed Waltz to drive much-needed reforms and who is, according to Politico, “generally well-regarded, including among many Democrats on Capitol Hill.” That’s rare praise for a Trump appointee.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PROBES UNRWA OVER ALLEGED EMPLOYMENT OF 1,500 TERRORISTS

Waltz is working to downsize the bloated U.N., focusing on its staff of 100,000 — individuals who are paid roughly 17% more than equivalent U.S. civil servants, according to Waltz. According to testimony he gave to Congress a few months ago, Waltz’s team pushed through a “historic 15% cut $570 million out of the U.N.’s regular budget. That will eliminate nearly 3000 headquarters positions.” That change alone provided a savings for U.S. taxpayers of $126 million. Waltz recently told Fox Digital that budget cuts now total $1 billion.

Waltz is also overhauling U.N. peacekeeping operations, some of which, as he has said, have been around for “30, 50 or even 80 years.” Waltz argues such forces are important to provide breathing room for political settlement of a conflict, but it “can’t then become an excuse to not have a political resolution. When you have a peacekeeping force, for example, in DRC and Congo, at the cost of a billion dollars a year, that’s been there for 30 years,” it should end.

Mike Waltz: 'Under President Trump we're demanding reform' at the United Nations Video

Waltz is just getting started; reforming an institution so large and complex takes time, which he may not have. Soon, the U.N. will elect a new secretary-general to succeed Portugal’s António Guterres, who has served since 2017. Currently, most of the candidates who have stepped forward appear eager to embrace the reforms advocated by the White House, alarmed that President Trump is ready to eviscerate the U.N.’s funding if changes are not made and a U.S.-friendly official not elected.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Finances are not Trump’s only weapon. As Politico reported, when the White House announced the creation of the Board of Peace last year to oversee the Israel-Gaza conflict, “U.N. officials and diplomats were really, really unnerved,” seeing that Board as some sort of “rival peacemaking institute.”

TRUMP-BACKED BOARD OF PEACE, ISRAEL ‘WILL TAKE ACTION’ IF HAMAS REMAINS OUT OF COMPLIANCE: NETANYAHU ADVISOR

However, permanent members of the Security Council, which include Russia, China, France, the U.K. and the U.S., can veto candidates. That is making the race unpredictable. If the members cannot agree, they could extend Gutterres’ term by another year, which would likely mean that President Trump would have less say in the outcome.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

That could trash the White House’s push to Make the U.N. Great Again and would be disastrous for the U.N.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM LIZ PEEK

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Today, President Trump will address the U.N. General Assembly. As New Yorkers fume over traffic nightmares created by the president and by hordes of visiting diplomats, they may (again) question, as do many Americans, why U.S. taxpayers support this badly managed and scandal-scarred institution. Especially when the U.N. so frequently works against our interests and seems incapable of accomplishing its primary mission.

A new Gallup poll shows that 73% of Americans think the U.N. does a poor job of “maintaining international peace and security,” and 70% say the same about the U.N. “upholding international law” and “protecting human rights.” That’s a lousy report card for an organization that spends roughly $70 billion per year.

Elsewhere in the world, the U.N. scores better, which is not surprising since poor countries, which constitute the majority of members, look to wealthier nations for handouts via the U.N. The nations of Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, are especially keen on the sprawling organization.

WALTZ DELIVERS BLUNT WARNING TO NATIONS DEFYING IRAN SANCTIONS, TOUTS GREENLAND DEAL

Trump heads to UN General Assembly as foreign policy challenges mount Video

How does that wealth transfer happen? One way was described by President Trump’s U.N. Ambassador Mike Waltz in recent testimony before Congress: “The U.N. let countries use peacekeeping missions as cash cows for their militaries. Peacekeepers could bring equipment, park it, never use it, take it home brand new, and get it paid for by the U.N.” Those operations can employ “10,000 to 18,000 soldiers”; the costs, Waltz says, are “quite significant.” He is ending that practice — just one step in reformin

!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->
Read More

Continue Reading