Internet Security

Shuffling The DEX

If you walk into a crowded place and shout Binance, there is probably someone who’s going to open their Binance app to check what’s going on. Centralized exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and HBTC dominate the crypto space. Their reach in the market is an indication that we are already in the crypto future. Statista reported…

If you walk into a crowded place and shout Binance, there is probably someone who’s going to open their Binance app to check what’s going on. Centralized exchanges like Binance, Coinbase, and HBTC dominate the crypto space. Their reach in the market is an indication that we are already in the crypto future. Statista reported earlier in the year that collectively, Binance, HBTC, and Hydax Exchange process $54 billion worth of transactions every 24 hours, almost a third of the global exchange volume. As crypto adoption continues to rise, a corresponding surge in the decentralized Finance (DeFi) sector has driven interests in DEXes to new heights. But there will always be problems that come with disruption. In the case of DEXes, the widespread problem has always been that decentralization comes at the cost of usability. The Problem With DEXes And The Rise Of Uniswap Decentralized Exchanges have quickly emerged as solutions to the problems plaguing centralized exchanges. For example, several centralized exchanges have been reported to have technical issues when the crypto market booms. The overreliance on cloud providers like AWS makes it difficult to prepare for these downtimes. Also, abuse of power is a regular occurrence. The QuadrigaCX scandal is a good reminder of this: $190 million in customer cash stored by the Canadian exchange disappeared with the CEO when he died in 2019, as it was all held on a single hardware wallet with no one knowing the password but the deceased. Decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges are designed to address issues that centralized exchanges have. They are peer-to-peer (p2p) markets directly built on the blockchain, allowing traders to keep and manage their funds independently. Instead of the exchange or any other middleman directing the flow of money, such as a bank or an internet payment gateway, this procedure is controlled by a series of smart contracts that keep track of transactions on the blockchain on which it is built. But DEXes also pose a series of problems Many exchange operations on DEXes, such as deposits (also known as locking funds), placing orders, and finalizing trades, require Ethereum transactions on DEXes, resulting in an annoying situation where almost every action you take on a DEX pops up a Metamask window asking for approval, often also requiring pausing while in-between transactions. In addition, Liquidity is frequently inadequate due to these exchanges’ poor user interface. Because order books are thin and spreads are big, prices are often lower than on a centralized exchange. Most DEXes today charge a premium for their privacy, security, and decentralization features. Hence, Uniswap Uniswap, unlike other DEXes, does not employ order books and instead relies on an algorithmic pricing method to provide liquidity and minimal spreads. This price method is operationally simple, making Uniswap’s smart contract operations very straightforward. This has the added benefit of increased security, as well as lower gas costs. Uniswap is an Automated Market Maker (AMM) that establishes token prices using a simple algorithm: x * y=k. The amount of ETH in the pool is represented by x, the number of tokens is represented by y, and k is constant in this equation. When ETH is used to purchase a token, x increases, y decreases, and the token price rises. Users do not input a price they want to purchase or sell at, unlike traditional exchanges. Uniswap works in a similar way to spot markets, where traders can only buy and sell at the current price in real-time. Built on the Ethereum blockchain, each ERC-20 token traded on Uniswap has a pool of Ether and a pool of the token. The ratio of the size of the ETH pool to the size of the token pool determines the price of the token at any given time. However, despite the radical departure from the status quo by Uniswap, there are other DEXes that offer alternative features that Uniswap doesn’t offer. Dexes bringing something new to the table. While Uniswap is popular in the crypto world, there are other DEXes that serve as viable alternatives or offer entirely different features. Here are some of them: 1. Balancer: like Uniswap, Balancer is an AMM that allows users to swap ERC20 tokens. However, as the name suggests Balancer is a portfolio management tool balancing assets in a liquidity pool based on a given ratio. Balancer has been a critical component of a number of highly successful DeFi initiatives, owing to its dependability, usability, and adaptability. Uniswap’s liquidity pools are always 50:50, whereas Balancer lets liquidity suppliers specify any ratio they choose (such as 98:2). As a result, many liquidity mining sites choose Balancer over Uniswap since it lowers the danger of temporary loss. Balancer still maintains one of the greatest trade volumes of any decentralized exchange, despite its recent decline in popularity. 2. Solrise: Built on Solana, Solrise is non-custodial and decentralized fund management and investment protocol that helps democratize the investment space. On this DEX, anyone can open a fund or invest. 3. MakiSwap: This DEX runs on the popular AMM protocol as a yield farming platform built on the Huobi Eco Chain. It is the first DEX that will offer a variety of trading experiences including limit orders; charts; analytics; order books, etc. The DEX is a product of the Unilayer Eco-system which allows token holders to also reap rewards. 4. Tezos Liquidity Baking: It is the first protocol layer DEX, giving it an immediate advantage over application layer DEXs such as Uniswap by allowing rewards to be distributed in protocol token rather than application token. 5. Alkemi Network: Unlike the aforementioned, Alkemi Network is a unique DEX in that it does something no other DEX platform does: it fuses CeFi institutions with the DeFi space. It Offers state-of-the-art cryptography and liquidity for financial institutions and individuals to access DeFibanf earn on their Ethereum-based digital assets. Alkemi Network: Merging CeFi to DeFi There seems to be a rift between Centralized Finance and Decentralized Finance in the crypto space. Thought mostly based on the features both spaces offers, the dichotomies overlaps. But with Alkemi Network, the differences are bridged and fused. Alkemi is a sophisticated liquidity network created with institutional and retail investors in mind to enable them to access and earn on their Ethereum-based digital assets. It’s the first liquidity platform to allow KYC permissioned and permissionless liquidity pools governed by one network utility token. The network allows participants to remain complaint by making them undergo KYC verifications before being allowed to interact within the pool. The major offering of this DEX is Alkemi Earn, a permission liquidity pool where trusted counterparties can borrow and lend in wBTC, USDC, DAI, and ETH. Users can then lend and borrow and are also rewarded through the liquidity mining program. Why Alkemi Network Is Different? There are numerous projects in the DeFi space. But what makes Alkemi stand out is their Alkemi Earn. With earn, users will not only be able to invest, they will be able to lend and borrow while also earning rewards through the liquidity mining program. Earn pools can also be implemented into centralized exchanges to give consumers who aren’t DeFi power users an embedded experience. Another thing to consider is that Alkemi Network has an accessible User interface which makes it more accessible for liquidity mining programs. The open-access for all kinds of investors makes it a true DeFi experience. The KYC used by Alkemi is also industry standard. There’s a rigorous screening of liquidity providers that helps to fortify the borrowing and lending protocol and code. Bringing it together As the DeFi space continues to expand, new projects will keep popping. The institution-grade liquidity network will help bridge CeFi and DeFi to allow seamless transactions including borrowing, lending, and investing.
Read More

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Internet Security

Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto but few make it central to wealth plans

Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto, but integration stays low. Security, fees and platform complexity emerge as key barriers to adoption. US investors show deepest crypto integration despite lower ownership rates. High-net-worth investors are increasingly buying crypto, but many are still reluctant to make it a major part of their long-term wealth plans


An investor checks rising cryptocurrency charts on a laptop and smartphone with a city skyline visible through the office window.

  • Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto, but integration stays low.
  • Security, fees and platform complexity emerge as key barriers to adoption.
  • US investors show deepest crypto integration despite lower ownership rates.

High-net-worth investors are increasingly buying crypto, but many are still reluctant to make it a major part of their long-term wealth plans, according to a new Nexo survey.

The report found that 67% of affluent investors across the US, UK and Argentina already own crypto. However, security concerns, high fees and complicated platforms are stopping many from using digital assets for retirement planning or replacing traditional investments.

Nexo published its “Future of Digital Wealth 2026” report on September 23 after surveying 1,000 affluent investors. Its new Crypto Integration Index, which measures how deeply crypto is incorporated into investors’ finances, produced an average score of 4.83 out of 10.

Ownership outpaces deeper integration

Nexo said a score near the survey average of 4.83 represents a small, short-horizon crypto position outside retirement planning.

Only 4.7% of surveyed investors scored seven or higher, a level Nexo describes as structurally integrated, where crypto has replaced a traditional asset and forms part of longer-term financial planning.

The report found that just under 20% of respondents expect crypto to become their number-one personal wealth driver over the next decade, ahead of salary, equities and real estate.

More than 40% are already invested in crypto without yet building wealth with it.

“Once an investor gets past the risk perception stage, what’s left is security, fees, and platform user-friendliness and capabilities – the same things we’ve spent years building Nexo to solve,” said Neil Steinhardt, COO, Nexo US.

That’s the gap between owning crypto and actually building wealth with it, and it’s exactly where our platform is designed to meet investors.

Integration also varies by market. Argentina had the highest ownership rate at 74%, but a CII score of 4.62. The US had the lowest ownership at 62%, but the deepest integration with a score of 5.07.

The UK recorded 65% ownership and a CII score of 4.75.

Platform trust becomes the next hurdle

The report said crypto integration peaks among investors aged 35 to 44, with 28% treating digital assets as a core retirement asset.

Investors aged 18 to 25 reported the highest ownership and conviction, with more than 90% holding crypto, but only 2% maintaining a horizon of 10 years or longer.

Among

Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

LIZ PEEK: Can Trump Make the UN Great Again despite its globalist agenda?

close Video Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon condemns the UN for allegedly including Israel in sexual violence blacklist Danny Danon, the Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations (UN), blasts the UN for what he claims is their decision to include Israel in a sexual violence blacklist that also includes Hamas. NEWYou can

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Today, President Trump will address the U.N. General Assembly. As New Yorkers fume over traffic nightmares created by the president and by hordes of visiting diplomats, they may (again) question, as do many Americans, why U.S. taxpayers support this badly managed and scandal-scarred institution. Especially when the U.N. so frequently works against our interests and seems incapable of accomplishing its primary mission.

A new Gallup poll shows that 73% of Americans think the U.N. does a poor job of “maintaining international peace and security,” and 70% say the same about the U.N. “upholding international law” and “protecting human rights.” That’s a lousy report card for an organization that spends roughly $70 billion per year.

Elsewhere in the world, the U.N. scores better, which is not surprising since poor countries, which constitute the majority of members, look to wealthier nations for handouts via the U.N. The nations of Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, are especially keen on the sprawling organization.

WALTZ DELIVERS BLUNT WARNING TO NATIONS DEFYING IRAN SANCTIONS, TOUTS GREENLAND DEAL

Trump heads to UN General Assembly as foreign policy challenges mount Video

How does that wealth transfer happen? One way was described by President Trump’s U.N. Ambassador Mike Waltz in recent testimony before Congress: “The U.N. let countries use peacekeeping missions as cash cows for their militaries. Peacekeepers could bring equipment, park it, never use it, take it home brand new, and get it paid for by the U.N.” Those operations can employ “10,000 to 18,000 soldiers”; the costs, Waltz says, are “quite significant.” He is ending that practice — just one step in reforming the bloated U.N., whose budget has quadrupled over the past 25 years.

Americans have reason for skepticism, given the frequent votes that go against the U.S. or our ally Israel. For thirty-three years in a row, the General Assembly has voted to end our embargo on Cuba, and for decades it has opposed Israel’s attempts to protects its citizens from Palestinian terrorists. Waltz calls the body a “cesspool of antisemitism.”

WALTZ SLAMS FRANCE AFTER STUNNING SOCIAL MEDIA ATTACK ON US AFTER UN VOTE

Not only is the U.N. frequently hostile to the U.S., it is often ridiculous. Most recently, the U.N. voted overwhelmingly to adopt a new map which blows up Africa’s presence on the globe; the U.S. was the sole dissenter. In a memo explaining our outlier vote, Deputy U.S. Representative Yaryna Ferencevych called such resolutions “barnacles on our work here” and wrote: “Instead of focusing on genuine problems of international peace… this body is debating map projects from the 16th century, and their role in promoting reparations and “cognitive justice.”

The U.N. rarely has much real-world impact. Critics might question, for instance, what the U.N. has done to resolve the Russia-Ukraine War, or how it has helped keep the world’s oil flowing through the Strait of Hormuz. The answer in both cases is zero.

Instead, the U.N. is hyper-focused on climate change, gender equality and other issues that may scratch a globalist itch, but appear little related to the cause of peace.

Demonstrators gather outside United Nations General Assembly Video

Meanwhile, the U.N. is going broke. Last year the Economist reported: “On May 5th the U.N. will brief members on a previously unreported $600m (17%) cut to its $3.7bn [administrative] budget aimed at avoiding default this year. It will include a hiring freeze… Yet it may not be enough. A combination of deadbeat members and mad budget rules have led to a liquidity crisis.”

TRUMP BRINGS NEW HEAT TO CONTROVERSIAL UN AGENCY AS ALLEGED HAMAS TIES ENGULF SCORES OF EMPLOYEES

The article goes on to warn that a “leaked memo” suggesting that the Trump administration might cut off funding to the U.N. threatened “a financial crash in the citadel of peace and security.”

The Trump White House has not bankrupted the U.N. by withholding payments. Instead, it appointed Waltz to drive much-needed reforms and who is, according to Politico, “generally well-regarded, including among many Democrats on Capitol Hill.” That’s rare praise for a Trump appointee.

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION PROBES UNRWA OVER ALLEGED EMPLOYMENT OF 1,500 TERRORISTS

Waltz is working to downsize the bloated U.N., focusing on its staff of 100,000 — individuals who are paid roughly 17% more than equivalent U.S. civil servants, according to Waltz. According to testimony he gave to Congress a few months ago, Waltz’s team pushed through a “historic 15% cut $570 million out of the U.N.’s regular budget. That will eliminate nearly 3000 headquarters positions.” That change alone provided a savings for U.S. taxpayers of $126 million. Waltz recently told Fox Digital that budget cuts now total $1 billion.

Waltz is also overhauling U.N. peacekeeping operations, some of which, as he has said, have been around for “30, 50 or even 80 years.” Waltz argues such forces are important to provide breathing room for political settlement of a conflict, but it “can’t then become an excuse to not have a political resolution. When you have a peacekeeping force, for example, in DRC and Congo, at the cost of a billion dollars a year, that’s been there for 30 years,” it should end.

Mike Waltz: 'Under President Trump we're demanding reform' at the United Nations Video

Waltz is just getting started; reforming an institution so large and complex takes time, which he may not have. Soon, the U.N. will elect a new secretary-general to succeed Portugal’s António Guterres, who has served since 2017. Currently, most of the candidates who have stepped forward appear eager to embrace the reforms advocated by the White House, alarmed that President Trump is ready to eviscerate the U.N.’s funding if changes are not made and a U.S.-friendly official not elected.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION

Finances are not Trump’s only weapon. As Politico reported, when the White House announced the creation of the Board of Peace last year to oversee the Israel-Gaza conflict, “U.N. officials and diplomats were really, really unnerved,” seeing that Board as some sort of “rival peacemaking institute.”

TRUMP-BACKED BOARD OF PEACE, ISRAEL ‘WILL TAKE ACTION’ IF HAMAS REMAINS OUT OF COMPLIANCE: NETANYAHU ADVISOR

However, permanent members of the Security Council, which include Russia, China, France, the U.K. and the U.S., can veto candidates. That is making the race unpredictable. If the members cannot agree, they could extend Gutterres’ term by another year, which would likely mean that President Trump would have less say in the outcome.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

That could trash the White House’s push to Make the U.N. Great Again and would be disastrous for the U.N.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM LIZ PEEK

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Today, President Trump will address the U.N. General Assembly. As New Yorkers fume over traffic nightmares created by the president and by hordes of visiting diplomats, they may (again) question, as do many Americans, why U.S. taxpayers support this badly managed and scandal-scarred institution. Especially when the U.N. so frequently works against our interests and seems incapable of accomplishing its primary mission.

A new Gallup poll shows that 73% of Americans think the U.N. does a poor job of “maintaining international peace and security,” and 70% say the same about the U.N. “upholding international law” and “protecting human rights.” That’s a lousy report card for an organization that spends roughly $70 billion per year.

Elsewhere in the world, the U.N. scores better, which is not surprising since poor countries, which constitute the majority of members, look to wealthier nations for handouts via the U.N. The nations of Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, are especially keen on the sprawling organization.

WALTZ DELIVERS BLUNT WARNING TO NATIONS DEFYING IRAN SANCTIONS, TOUTS GREENLAND DEAL

Trump heads to UN General Assembly as foreign policy challenges mount Video

How does that wealth transfer happen? One way was described by President Trump’s U.N. Ambassador Mike Waltz in recent testimony before Congress: “The U.N. let countries use peacekeeping missions as cash cows for their militaries. Peacekeepers could bring equipment, park it, never use it, take it home brand new, and get it paid for by the U.N.” Those operations can employ “10,000 to 18,000 soldiers”; the costs, Waltz says, are “quite significant.” He is ending that practice — just one step in reformin

!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->!—->
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Niger Miners’ Deaths: CSOs Demand Transparent Probe, Caution Against Speculation

A coalition of civil society organisations led by Stand Up Nigeria (SUN) has appealed to Nigerians to remain calm and avoid spreading unverified information on social media over the deaths of 37 suspected illegal miners in the custody of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) in Niger State…

A coalition of civil society organisations led by Stand Up Nigeria (SUN) has appealed to Nigerians to remain calm and avoid spreading unverified information on social media over the deaths of 37 suspected illegal miners in the custody of the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps (NSCDC) in Niger State…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Artists can express humanitarian concerns, but not undermine public order and security: Tan Kiat How

Advertisement Singapore Artistes can express humanitarian concerns, but not undermine public order and security: Tan Kiat How Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How cited several performances dealing with social and humanitarian issues that had been allowed to proceed in Singapore. Robert Del Naja and Grant Marshall from Massive Attack stand with a Palestinian flag

Advertisement

Singapore

Artistes can express humanitarian concerns, but not undermine public order and security: Tan Kiat How

Senior Minister of State Tan Kiat How cited several performances dealing with social and humanitarian issues that had been allowed to proceed in Singapore.

Artistes can express humanitarian concerns, but not undermine public order and security: Tan Kiat How

Robert Del Naja and Grant Marshall from Massive Attack stand with a Palestinian flag onstage at the end of their performance in Singapore, July 29, 2026, in this screengrab from video obtained from social media. Simran Panaech/via REUTERS


New: You can now listen to articles.


This audio is generated by an AI tool.

Justin Ong Guang-Xi

Justin Ong Guang-Xi

Justin Ong Guang-Xi

10 Sep 2026 01:42PM
(Updated: 10 Sep 2026 02:06PM)



Bookmark



Bookmark



Share

SINGAPORE: Artistes can express humanitarian concerns about international conflicts, but such expression should not undermine public order, security or stability in Singapore, Senior Minister of State for Digital Development and Information Tan Kiat How said on Thursday (Sep 10).

“Singapore should not be used by foreigners as a platform to further political causes, including those relating to conflicts or political issues overseas,” he said.

Artistes, whether Singaporean or foreign, are expected to abide by Singapore’s laws and the conditions of the arts entertainment licence when performing here, he added.

Mr Tan was responding in parliament to MP Hazlina Abdul Halim (PAP-East Coast), who asked how authorities distinguish prohibited political advocacy from expressions of humanitarian concern.

CNA Games
Guess Word
Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time

Buzzword
Buzzword
Create words using the given letters

Mini Sudoku
Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser

Mini Crossword
Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge

Word Search
Word Search
Spot as many words as you can

Show More

Show Less

She also asked how an artiste’s intent and the context of an expression are taken into account, and whether licensing conditions would be reviewed to exclude peaceful expressions of support for humanitarian causes.

Mr Tan said that besides an artiste’s intention, the Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) considers the likely impact of a performance when assessing whether it meets licensing conditions.

Under IMDA’s Arts Entertainment Classification Code, content should not undermine public order, national security or stability.

The code, which sets out the framework for assessing and classifying live or public arts entertainment, also states that content should be “sensitive to the concerns of different racial or religious groups and the prevailing community expectations of what is necessary to safeguard racial harmony and religious harmony”.

In July, members of British band Massive Attack were issued stern warnings and barred from re-entering Singapore after flying a Palestinian flag during a concert, with one of the members shouting “Free Palestine”.


06:31 Min

The government recognises the humanitarian impact of international conflicts and that artistes may wish to express concern for those affected. Such expressions are not prohibited but should not undermine public order, national security or stability in Singapore. This condition is made clear in the Arts Entertainment Classification Code issued by the Infocomm Media Development Authority. Senior Minister of State for Digital Development and Information Tan Kiat How highlighted this approach in reply to an MP’s questions in parliament on Thursday (Sep 10). He stressed that Singapore should not be used by foreigners as a platform to further political causes, including those relating to conflicts or political issues overseas. 

Ms Hazlina asked Mr Tan for examples of performances involving social causes that had been allowed to take place.

He cited To The Unforgotten, an event held in May this year that featured a song, poem and multimedia artwork about the Israel-Gaza conflict. It was classified R18.

Another example was 6 Microlectures on Genocides. Also classified R18, the play comprised short works that explore themes of genocide, war crimes and contemporary conflicts, Mr Tan said.

He also pointed to the 2024 stand-up comedy show Namaste, which was classified Advisory 16 and included a segment in which comedians spoke about the Israel-Gaza conflict.

“So having material and content on causes itself is not prohibited, and the licensing framework is designed to, of course, protect young people from unwanted content, but also allow people to make decisions on what they can watch,” said Mr Tan.

“But at the same time, having some boundaries on the kind of content that may stir up public disorder or national security considerations.”

Mr Tan said assessments were “very contextual” and encouraged applicants for Arts Entertainment Licences to engage IMDA early.

“The earlier the applicants engage IMDA, the earlier conversations can start, and earlier we can give clarity and guidance on the kind of content that may be approved and

!–>!–>
Read More

Continue Reading