Internet Security

Trump’s $2,000 stimulus checks demand could cost the GOP its Senate majority, but reveals his enduring influence within the party

Summary List PlacementIn his final weeks in office, President Donald Trump has uncharacteristically sided with congressional Democrats and positioned himself against Republicans over his push for bigger COVID-19 stimulus checks. The move could end up vilifying Senate Republicans in the eyes of voters ahead of a crucial runoff election in Georgia that will determine if…

Summary List PlacementIn his final weeks in office, President Donald Trump has uncharacteristically sided with congressional Democrats and positioned himself against Republicans over his push for bigger COVID-19 stimulus checks. The move could end up vilifying Senate Republicans in the eyes of voters ahead of a crucial runoff election in Georgia that will determine if the GOP maintains its majority in the upper chamber.
After Democratic and Republican leaders passed a long-awaited $900 billion stimulus package last Monday, Trump put the pandemic-related aid for millions of Americans in limbo for days, with an unexpected plea to bump up direct payments included in the bill from $600 to $2,000.
Trump eventually signed the bill on Sunday evening, without any changes, though he continues to tout his demands for the additional relief, which had already been heard loud and clear by Democrats, as he plays golf in Florida. 
The Democratic-controlled House passed a standalone bill on Monday that would provide Americans earning up to $75,000 with a one-time direct payment of $2,000 instead of $600.
Senate Democrats on Tuesday urged the upper chamber to follow suit, and called on Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to hold an immediate vote on the bigger checks, to no avail. McConnell blocked the initial measure, but indicated he would consider the proposed relief along with other Trump demands, including removing legal protections for tech companies and investigating voter fraud in the 2020 elections. 
Some Senate Republicans are gradually breaking from McConnell

For months, McConnell has been opposed to raising the legislative price-tag during stimulus talks, and even negotiated to lower direct payments to $600 from $1,200 — the amount approved as part of the first major COVID-19 economic package.
However, some Republicans are gradually beginning to break from McConnell and back Trump’s calls for $2,000 checks, signaling the outgoing president’s outsized, ongoing influence within his party and on the nation’s politics more broadly. 
Two Republicans who’ve shown support for bigger checks include Georgia Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, both of whom are facing tough reelection fights in the hopes of maintaining the Republican majority in the Senate, which will be decided in runoff races on January 5.
Loeffler and Perdue had tiptoed around the subject up until Tuesday, when they both rallied behind the $2,000 checks, suggesting the path to winning in Georgia is through defending Trump.
“The president has fought for our country from day one,” Loeffler told Fox News on Tuesday. “He continues to fight for every single American. I’ve stood by the president 100% of the time. I’m proud to do that. And I’ve said absolutely we need to get relief to Americans now, and I will support that.”
Trump has put McConnell in an uncomfortable position, and provided Democrats with a huge opportunity
McConnell’s obstinance on the $2,000 checks has offered Democrats an ideal messaging opportunity ahead of Georgia’s Senate runoff election. And by supporting the bigger checks, Trump has put McConnell between rock and a hard place.
Many economists have argued that additional aid to Americans can offer a boost to the US economic recovery, after the coronavirus pandemic forced millions of people out of their jobs and with unemployment claims still rising each week. Similarly, most Americans are hugely in favor of stimulus checks and prefer a bigger size, according to a recent poll conducted by Insider, which showed that both Democrats and Republicans overwhelmingly support direct payments worth more than $600. 
The GOP leader is denying more assistance to Americans at a time when they’re desperately in need, and defying a president who is extremely popular with Republican voters — a week before an election that will determine if he remains at the helm of the Senate. 

Unless Republicans have a death wish, and it is also the right thing to do, they must approve the $2000 payments ASAP. $600 IS NOT ENOUGH! Also, get rid of Section 230 – Don’t let Big Tech steal our Country, and don’t let the Democrats steal the Presidential Election. Get tough! https://t.co/GMotstu7OI — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 29, 2020

 
Senate Democrats slammed the GOP for resisting sending more money to Americans while unequivocally embracing $741 billion for the National Defense Authorization Act, an annual spending bill passed by the House and Senate earlier this month.
“My Republican colleagues seem more interested in funding defense than funding the defenseless,” Sen. Ed Markey of Massachussetts said. 
Trump vetoed the must-pass national security legislation last week because it didn’t include an unrelated provision that would hold social media companies accountable for what he describes as anti-conservative biases on their platforms.
The House voted on Monday to override the president’s veto of the defense bill that keeps the military funded, and McConnell aims to do the same in the Senate.
Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, an independent who caucuses with Democrats and has been leading the charge for the $2,000 checks, ripped into McConnell’s refusal to hold an immediate vote on the payments and responded by objecting to a fast-track vote that would override Trump’s veto of the annual defense bill.
“Do we turn our backs on struggling working families or do we respond to their pain?” Sanders said on Tuesday. 

“Working families need help now. Not next year, but right now,” Sen. Sanders says on House passing bill to increase stimulus payments to $2,000.“Now it is time for the Senate to step up to the plate and do what the working families of this country overwhelmingly want us to do.” pic.twitter.com/nvbee22cWO — MSNBC (@MSNBC) December 29, 2020

 
Likewise, Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut excoriated Republicans for expressing concern about the national deficit in relation to calls for fatter stimulus checks, a core GOP talking point that has been used to justify smaller direct payments.
“Frankly, spare me the fake righteous indignation about the deficit all of a sudden. Three years ago these same deficit hawk Republicans passed a tax cut bill that before the pandemic hit had already added over $200 billion to the annual deficit,” Murphy said. “And that was a tax cut where 80% of the benefits went to the richest 1% of Americans.”
‘Which side are they on right now?’
As he shut down votes on the $2,000 checks on Tuesday, McConnell noted that the Senate would consider looking into bigger payments, but in concert with Trump’s additional demands on social media and voter fraud. 
“Those are the three important subjects the President has linked together,” the GOP leader said. “This week the Senate will begin a process to bring these three priorities into focus.”
Yet packaging the issues together could effectively sink the effort for $2,000 checks, as it remains unlikely Democrats would agree to it alongside other terms initially put forth by Trump. 
“The House passed, to their credit, a simple, straightforward bill. Let’s not muddy the waters,” Sanders told reporters on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. “Are you for $2,000, or are you not? Let’s not talk about so-called voter fraud or abortion or anything else. That’s what the American people want to know: Which side are they on right now?Join the conversation about this story » NOW WATCH: July 15 is Tax Day — here’s what it’s like to do your own taxes for the very first time
Read More

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Internet Security

COLDCARD SECURITY RISK: IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED

Bitcoin Magazine COLDCARD SECURITY RISK: IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED IMPORTANT: Major security vulnerability discovered in Coldcard hardware wallets. For your own safety read disclosures and take necessary actions immediately. This post COLDCARD SECURITY RISK: IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Shinobi…

Bitcoin Magazine

COLDCARD SECURITY RISK: IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED
IMPORTANT: Major security vulnerability discovered in Coldcard hardware wallets. For your own safety read disclosures and take necessary actions immediately.
This post COLDCARD SECURITY RISK: IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED first appeared on Bitcoin Magazine and is written by Shinobi…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Coldcard Security Notice Puts Bitcoin Wallet Entropy Risk Back In Focus

A Coldcard security issue has put Bitcoin hardware-wallet safety back under the microscope after reports that a firmware flaw affected seed generation…

A Coldcard security issue has put Bitcoin hardware-wallet safety back under the microscope after reports that a firmware flaw affected seed generation…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

How a national security threat label has reignited Indonesia’s LGBTQ debate

Advertisement Asia How a national security threat label has reignited Indonesia’s LGBTQ debate Indonesia last October classified the “spread of LGBTQ culture” as one of the country’s non-military threats. A series of developments thrust the provision into the public eye this month, sparking a debate.   A street vendor walks past a banner reading ‘Indonesia

Advertisement

Asia

How a national security threat label has reignited Indonesia’s LGBTQ debate

Indonesia last October classified the “spread of LGBTQ culture” as one of the country’s non-military threats. A series of developments thrust the provision into the public eye this month, sparking a debate.

 

How a national security threat label has reignited Indonesia's LGBTQ debate

A street vendor walks past a banner reading ‘Indonesia LGBT Emergency’ in front a mosque in Jakarta, Indonesia, January 25, 2018. (REUTERS/Beawiharta)


New: You can now listen to articles.


This audio is generated by an AI tool.

Ericssen

Ericssen

Ericssen

21 Jul 2026 06:00AM
(Updated: 21 Jul 2026 10:59AM)



Bookmark



Bookmark



Share

SINGAPORE: For more than eight months, a provision tucked away in an Indonesian presidential regulation on national defence drew little public attention.

In an appendix to Presidential Regulation No. 111/2025 on the General National Defence Policy signed in October last year, the government classified the “spread of LGBTQ culture” as one of the country’s non-military threats. 

The clause, referring to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual and queer culture, appeared alongside a range of other threats deemed capable of affecting national resilience. They included illegal trafficking, natural resource theft, terrorism, atheism and radicalism.

A presidential regulation is a legally binding regulation published in the State Gazette, while General National Defence Policy documents are highly technical and usually attract little public attention outside government and defence circles.

But a series of developments thrust the provision into the public eye this month, sparking a debate on the place of LGBTQ issues in state policy and the extent to which social issues should be framed within Indonesia’s defence strategy.

The issue quickly spread beyond social media into mainstream Indonesian media with national outlets including Antara, Kumparan, and Tempo examining the regulation and prompting public responses from senior government officials.

Some observers and activists say the clause could heighten discrimination against LGBTQ individuals in society, even as Indonesian ministers have defended the regulation while saying the government has no intention of curtailing the fundamental rights of citizens.

“As Indonesian citizens, LGBTQ people are entitled to education, employment, healthcare and other public services without restrictions, segregation or discrimination,” Indonesia’s Human Rights Minister Natalius Pigai told CNA in a phone interview.

CNA Games
Guess Word
Guess Word
Crack the word, one row at a time

Buzzword
Buzzword
Create words using the given letters

Mini Sudoku
Mini Sudoku
Tiny puzzle, mighty brain teaser

Mini Crossword
Mini Crossword
Small grid, big challenge

Word Search
Word Search
Spot as many words as you can

Show More

Show Less

Indonesia’s Human Rights Minister Natalius Pigai. (Photo courtesy of Human Rights Ministry)

But he added that Indonesian society is not ready to accept the LGBTQ community, even as the state remains obliged to respect, protect and fulfil every citizen’s rights to education, employment, healthcare and public services.

“The time has not yet come to formally recognise them as an official group because society is not yet ready to accept them,” he said.

HOW THE CLAUSE CAME TO PUBLIC ATTENTION

While it remains unclear what first drew widespread attention to the provision, it resurfaced amid a series of developments involving LGBTQ issues. One was a Pride Month-themed social media post in mid-June by Suara Mahasiswa, a student publication at the University of Indonesia.

The post had led to a heated online debate, with critics arguing it was inconsistent with Indonesia’s religious and social norms. They questioned why it invoked the Pancasila national ideology to defend the LGBTQ community. Pancasila comprises five principles: Belief in one God, civilised humanity, national unity, democracy and social justice.

The backlash prompted the university to publicly distance itself from the post and launch an internal review.

Then in late June, the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) said it was preparing an academic paper and a draft bill to criminalise LGBTQ-related conduct for Parliament’s National Legislation Programme.

MUI deputy chairman Muhammad Cholil Nafis argued that moral appeals alone were no longer sufficient to curb what he described as the growing activities and campaign surrounding LGBTQ culture.

“If there are no legal penalties at all, it eventually becomes normal. We should not normalise it. Punishment helps people understand that it is not normal,” he said.

“Deviant activities, such as same-sex parties, are now increasingly being displayed openly in public without any sense of shame,” he added.

Scrutiny then shifted to the new regulation that had previously gone largely unnoticed.

The belated attention came as no surprise to Agus Wahyudi, head of the Inter-Religious Studies Programme at Gadjah Mada University (UGM) in Yogyakarta.

Documents such as the General National Defence Policy typically circulate within government bureaucracy and rarely become the subject of public debate, he said.

But a provision can take on political significance when a series of events – in this case, the Pride Month-themed social media post and the MUI’s planned bill – draws the public’s notice, said Agus.

“What changed was not necessarily the policy itself, but the public attention it attracted,” Agus said.

WHY WAS IT PLACED IN A NATIONAL DEFENCE DOCUMENT?

Asked whether the presidential regulation represented the first national policy to explicitly mention LGBTQ, human rights lawyer Asfinawati said Indonesia’s 2008 Pornography Law referred to “lesbian” and “homosexual” acts in its explanatory notes to a provision banning the production, distribution and sale of pornographic material.

It defined what the law described as “deviant sexual intercourse” for the purposes of pornography offences, rather than creating a standalone offence based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

Presidential Regulation No. 111/2025 goes further by classifying the “spread of LGBTQ culture” itself as a non-military threat, argued Asfinawati, the former chair of the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation.

“This regulation no longer links it to sexual conduct. Simply having a particular sexual orientation or gender identity is placed within a threat framework,” she said.

Experts have questioned whether a national defence framework was an appropriate instrument for addressing issues such as sexual orientation and gender identity.

In principle, national defence should focus on military threats, said Tangguh Chairil, a lecturer in security studies at the Department of International Relations at Binus University, Jakarta.

Indonesia, however, classifies threats into three categories: Military, non-military and hybrid. As a result, issues beyond the traditional defence sphere are increasingly viewed as national security issues.

“Because the definition is so broad, almost anything can be treated as a national security threat,” Tangguh told CNA.

Classifying LGBTQ culture as a non-military threat under a defence framework means the issue may be treated as a security concern requiring state attention and resources, he added.

“Issues that have been successfully securitised tend to receive greater attention than others,” he said.

Yusril Ihza Mahendra, Coordinating Minister for Legal Affairs, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections, told news outlet Tempo on Jul 9 that “non-military threat” was used to categorise risks against national resilience.

In the socio-cultural context, “resilience” refers to values, ethics, character of the younger generation, families, digital space, and social cohesion, he said.

“What the government perceives as a threat is the campaign, propaganda, and dissemination of LGBT behaviour aimed at altering the values that align with the nation’s culture and morality,” he added.

Indonesia’s Chief Minister for Law and Human Rights, Yusril Ihza Mahendra, speaks as Australia’s Minister for Home Affairs, Tony Burke, listens during a press conference following their meeting in Jakarta, Indonesia, December 3, 2024. (REUTERS/Willy Kurniawan)

Asfinawati said the regulation cannot serve as the legal basis for introducing new criminal provisions or for regional governments to impose criminal sanctions unless authorised by law.

Under Indonesian law, a person’s sexual orientation as well as consensual same-sex relations between adults are not, by themselves, criminal offences. The exception is Aceh province, which implements Islamic crimina

Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Nigeria: UNICEF chief urges child protection amid security, humanitarian crises

Violence in Nigeria The head of the U.N. children’s agency visited northwestern Nigeria on Friday as conflict, poverty and rising food insecurity leave millions of children in the region in need of aid. Catherine Russell, executive director of UNICEF, toured the state of Sokoto, where the agency is seeking to draw attention to worsening humanitarian

Violence in Nigeria

The head of the U.N. children’s agency visited northwestern Nigeria on Friday as conflict, poverty and rising food insecurity leave millions of children in the region in need of aid.

Catherine Russell, executive director of UNICEF, toured the state of Sokoto, where the agency is seeking to draw attention to worsening humanitarian challenges facing children.

She met with state officials and visited UNICEF-supported programs aimed at improving the health of both mothers and children and protecting vulnerable youngsters.

“We have to make sure that children are protected in these conflicts,” she said.

“That their healthcare is protected, that their food is protected, that their education is protected. Children can’t waste years of their life because conflicts are going on.”

Northern Nigeria is already gripped by an intensifying security crisis that has killed thousands.

The ongoing Middle East conflict has deepened food insecurity for millions living in poverty, making children in poor households more vulnerable.

According to UNICEF between 18.3 million and 23.4 million more children in monetarily poor households worldwide have fallen into deeper poverty, including 6.5 million to 8.8 million in Africa.

Nigeria has one of the world’s largest populations of impoverished children, and humanitarian organizations warn that those in the country’s conflict-torn north remain among the most vulnerable.

For some, UNICEF-supported programs have made a tangible difference.

Zainab Bello, 19, said she had been out of school before joining the agency’s “Digital Village” program.

“I was taught digital literacy… how to use a digital tool,” she said.

“I also learned how I can promote my vocational skills on various social media platforms.”

The head of the U.N. children’s agency visited northwestern Nigeria on Friday as conflict, poverty and rising food insecurity leave millions of children in the region in need of aid.

Catherine Russell, executive director of UNICEF, toured the state of Sokoto, where the agency is seeking to draw attention to worsening humanitarian challenges facing children.

She met with state officials and visited UNICEF-supported programs aimed at improving the health of both mothers and children and protecting vulnerable youngsters.

“We have to make sure that children are protected in these conflicts,” she said.

“That their healthcare is protected, that their food is protected, that their education is protected. Children can’t waste years of their life because conflicts are going on.”

Northern Nigeria is already gripped by an intensifying security crisis that has killed thousands.

The ongoing Middle East conflict has deepened food insecurity for millions living in poverty, making children in poor households more vulnerable.

According to UNICEF between 18.3 million and 23.4 million more children in monetarily poor households worldwide have fallen into deeper poverty, including 6.5 million to 8.8 million in Africa.

Nigeria has one of the world’s largest populations of impoverished children, and humanitarian organizations warn that those in the country’s conflict-torn north remain among the most vulnerable.

For some, UNICEF-supported programs have made a tangible difference.

Zainab Bello, 19, said she had been out of school before joining the agency’s “Digital Village” program.

“I was taught digital literacy… how to use a digital tool,” she said.

“I also learned how I can promote my vocational skills on various social media platforms.”

Read More

Continue Reading