Enterprise, Internet Security

How do companies protect against a security breach?

It is no secret that any criminal will have his eyes on the biggest piece of cake he can acquire….

It is no secret that any criminal will have his eyes on the biggest piece of cake he can acquire. It is no different when it comes to cybercriminals. And for them, their favorite desserts are the big tech companies. That is why it is so important for every company to do what they can to protect against a security breach.

With huge amounts of sensitive/customer data around, exploiting just one company can give access to information worth millions of dollars!

No matter how protected business databases tend to be, hackers have very often been able to effectively slip through corporate security defense systems.

One recent example is the Petya Ransomware, a cyber attack predominantly targeted on Ukraine that caused havoc all across Europe and various other parts of the world with an estimated damage of more than $300 million to businesses – most of them being government organizations.

While large tech-companies invest millions of dollars on advanced defense systems, they are often defeated by stronger players in the wilds of the internet. It’s events like these that have pushed tech companies in stepping up their cybersecurity game like never before.

 

So, what do companies do to protect against a security breach?

 

Identity and access management (IAM) systems

Traditionally, identity management has been broadly defined as the set of policies, processes, and technologies used for managing access to information systems through the right individuals. It is the core network responsible for safeguarding digital data while effectively tracking system activities.

Even though the system itself is quite complex, the concept is simple – enhancing the privacy of data by limiting the various associated attributes to certain interactions.

 

Restricting use of unnecessary hardware and software

The higher the number of software or hardware connected to the network- the higher the number of possible exploits. Even though, software companies that sell their products to various IT firms make sure they are immune to cyber attacks, using a redundant program just isn’t worth taking the risk.

More often than not, giant tech firms make sure that different departments of their organization have devices connected to different servers, so that, even if one gets breached, the rest stay secured.

 

Background checks and constant monitoring

While IT firms carefully monitor for possible malware trying to attack their systems, there have been a good number of instances of intrusion from inside the network. No matter how high-caliber cybersecurity a company has, nothing can stop sensitive data from being stolen if it is operated by someone having a different purpose.

Lately, tech-firms have started resorting to serious background checks and screenings before giving access to important information to their employees.

 

IT training

Tech-firms and hackers, both, are well aware of each others’ goals! What that means is hackers know that their potential targets have taken the mandatory measures to try to keep them at bay from attacking their servers. Cyber culprits, however, have more than a dozen ways of sneaking into systems which they successfully achieve by capitalizing on human error.

Tech-firms have paid significant attention on developing a corporate culture focusing on security training programs aimed at teaching their employees the risks of negligent use of networks, phishing content, careless password management and improper disposal of information.

 

Encrypting Data

While having sensitive data stolen is a nightmare itself, things get a lot worse when this stolen data can be used for the wrong purposes. One way to keep data safer is by converting it into a code which can be decoded only by the entity with the decryption key. This doesn’t mean hackers might not have a solution of converting encoded information into a readable form. However, it certainly makes things harder for someone trying to obtain unauthorized access.

 

Strong Passwords and Password Managers

Using strong usernames and passwords should be a no-brainer. However, what is more important is properly storing them and that is where a password manager comes to play.

Password managers are software that saves usernames/passwords and keeps them encrypted. However, the risk here is the software itself as it is the master program containing all the passkeys. A security issue with it is enough to create a potential security risk.

 

Having information stolen is the last thing any organization would want to happen, especially if it is that of their clients. Not only it is a matter of reputation, a company might face serious legal issues for not being able to protect their customer’s information.

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Enterprise

Metaplanet Bitcoin Investment Clears Super League Shareholder Vote

TL;DR: Super League shareholders have approved proposals connected to Metaplanet’s plan to contribute 2,100 BTC and cash to a new US-listed Bitcoin treasury platform. Metaplanet’s proposed American Bitcoin treasury vehicle has moved a step closer to reality, but the transaction has not yet closed. Super League Enterprise said shareholders approved the relevant proposals at their

TL;DR: Super League shareholders have approved proposals connected to Metaplanet’s plan to contribute 2,100 BTC and cash to a new US-listed Bitcoin treasury platform. Metaplanet’s proposed American Bitcoin treasury vehicle has moved a step closer to reality, but the transaction has not yet closed. Super League Enterprise said shareholders approved the relevant proposals at their annual meeting on October 16…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

SA Man Charged Over Online Threats to Police Officers | Mirage News

A South Australian man has been charged over alleged online threats toward police officers. The AFP’s National Security Investigations (NSI) team began an investigation in September after South Australia Police referred a series of social media posts for investigation. It’s alleged the posts advocated violence against police and made threats towards a number of senior

A South Australian man has been charged over alleged online threats toward police officers. The AFP’s National Security Investigations (NSI) team began an investigation in September after South Australia Police referred a series of social media posts for investigation. It’s alleged the posts advocated violence against police and made threats towards a number of senior
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Crypto hardware wallets compared for 2026

From touchscreen and QR-code devices to NFC cards and Bitcoin-only models, this guide compares hardware wallets by security, connectivity, usability and recovery options to help users choose the right fit…

From touchscreen and QR-code devices to NFC cards and Bitcoin-only models, this guide compares hardware wallets by security, connectivity, usability and recovery options to help users choose the right fit…
Read More

Continue Reading
Internet Security

Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto but few make it central to wealth plans

Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto, but integration stays low. Security, fees and platform complexity emerge as key barriers to adoption. US investors show deepest crypto integration despite lower ownership rates. High-net-worth investors are increasingly buying crypto, but many are still reluctant to make it a major part of their long-term wealth plans


An investor checks rising cryptocurrency charts on a laptop and smartphone with a city skyline visible through the office window.

  • Nexo says 67% of affluent investors own crypto, but integration stays low.
  • Security, fees and platform complexity emerge as key barriers to adoption.
  • US investors show deepest crypto integration despite lower ownership rates.

High-net-worth investors are increasingly buying crypto, but many are still reluctant to make it a major part of their long-term wealth plans, according to a new Nexo survey.

The report found that 67% of affluent investors across the US, UK and Argentina already own crypto. However, security concerns, high fees and complicated platforms are stopping many from using digital assets for retirement planning or replacing traditional investments.

Nexo published its “Future of Digital Wealth 2026” report on September 23 after surveying 1,000 affluent investors. Its new Crypto Integration Index, which measures how deeply crypto is incorporated into investors’ finances, produced an average score of 4.83 out of 10.

Ownership outpaces deeper integration

Nexo said a score near the survey average of 4.83 represents a small, short-horizon crypto position outside retirement planning.

Only 4.7% of surveyed investors scored seven or higher, a level Nexo describes as structurally integrated, where crypto has replaced a traditional asset and forms part of longer-term financial planning.

The report found that just under 20% of respondents expect crypto to become their number-one personal wealth driver over the next decade, ahead of salary, equities and real estate.

More than 40% are already invested in crypto without yet building wealth with it.

“Once an investor gets past the risk perception stage, what’s left is security, fees, and platform user-friendliness and capabilities – the same things we’ve spent years building Nexo to solve,” said Neil Steinhardt, COO, Nexo US.

That’s the gap between owning crypto and actually building wealth with it, and it’s exactly where our platform is designed to meet investors.

Integration also varies by market. Argentina had the highest ownership rate at 74%, but a CII score of 4.62. The US had the lowest ownership at 62%, but the deepest integration with a score of 5.07.

The UK recorded 65% ownership and a CII score of 4.75.

Platform trust becomes the next hurdle

The report said crypto integration peaks among investors aged 35 to 44, with 28% treating digital assets as a core retirement asset.

Investors aged 18 to 25 reported the highest ownership and conviction, with more than 90% holding crypto, but only 2% maintaining a horizon of 10 years or longer.

Among

Read More

Continue Reading