Antivirus

Dr.Web Security Space

Founded back in 1992, Dr.Web is a Russian developer with a vast range of security products for desktops and mobile devices.Dr.Web Secure Space is a security suite which includes antivirus, URL filtering, a firewall, spam filter, parental controls and more.The latest edition adds Dr.Web ShellGuard, which the company describes as ‘enhanced Dr.Web process heuristic technology’…


Founded back in 1992, Dr.Web is a Russian developer with a vast range of security products for desktops and mobile devices.

Dr.Web Secure Space is a security suite which includes antivirus, URL filtering, a firewall, spam filter, parental controls and more.

The latest edition adds Dr.Web ShellGuard, which the company describes as ‘enhanced Dr.Web process heuristic technology’ which ‘protects against attacks involving zero-day exploits.’

The ShellGuard description on the ‘New Features’ page doesn’t give a detailed explanation of the technology, but from what we can see, it doesn’t appear to be anything revolutionary.

For instance, it apparently detects threats based on reputation information on the cloud – files that are 100% clean, digital signatures of known threats and so on – which many vendors have been doing for years.

  • You can sign up for Dr.Web Security Space here

Pricing can be as low as €14 (£12.64, $16.05) for a one PC/Mac, one-year license, if you opt for no technical support. If that’s a step too far, the with-support price doubles to €28 (£25.28, $32.10). Both options offer deep discounting if you add more users and extend the term. For example, a three device, three-year license with tech support costs €98 (£88.50, $112.35).

These are decent prices for a full security suite, but the company doesn’t stop there. Dr.Web also offers some impressive discounts on renewal, starting at 40% off the regular price. Long-term customers could save a lot of cash.

Dr.Web Security Space

Setup

Dr.Web Security Space is available in trial form, in theory giving you a generous three months for free if you register. However, the company makes this more difficult than usual – we had to hand over our email address, complete a CAPTCHA, receive an email, click a link, provide our name and country, subscribe to Dr.Web emails and complete another CAPTCHA. But finally, we got a real download link, and were able to grab and install the program.

We rebooted, as prompted, and watched as the firewall asked us to create new rules for just about every internet call made on our system, even from well-known and entirely safe services such as Dashlane and BackBlaze.

Dr.Web Security Space

You only have to do this once per application and connection type (and there are other firewall modes, if you can find them), but it’s still a major hassle. We much prefer more modern and intelligent firewalls from providers such as Bitdefender, Kaspersky and Symantec, which are smart enough to make most decisions entirely on their own.

We browsed the Dr.Web installation and found more than 1GB of files, including signature databases. The package also added no less than five background processes, grabbing close to 500MB RAM. That’s more than most of the competition, but we didn’t find Dr.Web made any noticeable difference to our system performance.

It’s impo

Read More

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Antivirus

Why There’s Simply No Need For Android Antivirus Apps Anymore

Many Android users install an antivirus app on a new device without thinking twice. In 2026, there are good reasons to skip that step entirely…

Many Android users install an antivirus app on a new device without thinking twice. In 2026, there are good reasons to skip that step entirely…
Read More

Continue Reading
Antivirus

‘People use smartphones more but invest less in their security’: New report claims McAfee and Norton remain the most loved antivirus brands as users ditch lesser-known security products for free tools like Microsoft Defender or Apple Xprotect

Copy link Facebook X Whatsapp Reddit Pinterest Flipboard Threads Email Share this article 0 Join the conversation Follow us Add us as a preferred source on Google Newsletter Subscribe to our newsletter Most smartphone users rely on built-in security without additional protection Paid antivirus adoption on mobile devices continues to decline steadily A significant share


  • Most smartphone users rely on built-in security without additional protection
  • Paid antivirus adoption on mobile devices continues to decline steadily
  • A significant share of users remains unprotected or unaware of safeguards

Most Americans now use their smartphones more than their computers, but very few spend money to protect those phones from hackers, new research has claimed.

A Cybernews report surveyed over 1,000 American adults, and found only 18% of mobile phone users pay for third-party antivirus software.

Built-in tools like Microsoft Defender and Apple’s XProtect have become the default choice for most people, while McAfee and Norton lead the paid market for the second year in a row.

Latest Videos From

You may like

  • Best antivirus software Best Antivirus Software 2026
  • People using Windows 11 laptops Can Windows 11’s built-in antivirus keep you safe? Microsoft thinks so
  • Norton 36src Premium Norton 360 Premium will protect your devices from AI scams, malware, and identity theft for less than $30

Smartphone owners are skipping extra security protections

Most consumers believe the security features already built into their phones are sufficient for daily use, and see little reason to spend extra money on something they think they already own for free.

Roughly 14% of mobile users say they have no cybersecurity tools installed at all on their devices. Another 16% cannot even name what protections they currently have in place.

On desktop computers, the situation looks very different, with far fewer unprotected machines and much wider adoption of third-party security tools.

Windows Defender and Apple’s native security features now serve as the primary defense for 53% of computer users and 51% of mobile users.

Most people choose these free options because they trust the operating system vendor to provide adequate baseline protection.

Paid antivirus adoption on computers has actually grown by 2% since last year, reaching 41% of users.

On mobile devices, however, third-party antivirus usage has dropped by roughly 10% over the same period, falling from 28% to just 18%.

What to read next

  • Customer at home looking happy because his network is protected by ESET Home Security We all need digital protection and the ESET Home Security Plan is the bees knees
  • A hand holding a mobile phone scans a QR code on a blurry laptop screen. The phone issues a warning that the QR code could be malicious. Microsoft phishing threat report shows 146% surge in quishing
  • Malware attack virus alert , malicious software infection , cyber security awareness training to protect business Time for an upgrade? Report warns outdated operating systems could be the ‘unnecessary risk’ your business forgot about

Mobile users face growing risks

Ransomware attacks targeting smartphones are still less common than those aimed at computers, but the threat landscape is shifting rapidly.

Users who depend solely on the free security tools that came with their phones may be underestimating what modern cybercriminals can do.

Paid subscriptions have gained ground over free alternatives, yet the majority of mobile owners still avoid spending money on dedicated protection.

Cybercrime exposure does influence some users to change their habits, but personal experience is not the main driver of adoption for most people.

Many users employ layered security approach, combining antivirus with VPNs and password managers.

However, the data shows that a large segment of mobile users remain either unprotected or unsure about what safeguards they have.

Established brands like McAfee and Norton continue to benefit from user trust, while lesser-known products struggle to gain acceptance even when their features are comparable.


Google logo on a black background next to text reading

Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

Read More

Continue Reading
Antivirus

Surfshark One review: Adequate antivirus protection with caveats

At a glanceExpert’s Rating Pros Clean, extremely simple interface Alternative ID lets you mask your whole identity, not just an email address VPN service is solid Cons Full scans hit PC performance hard Very few settings to adjust Not as many features as similarly priced rivals Our Verdict If VPN coverage is your first priority…

At a glanceExpert’s Rating

Pros

Clean, extremely simple interface

Alternative ID lets you mask your whole identity, not just an email address

VPN service is solid

Cons

Full scans hit PC performance hard

Very few settings to adjust

Not as many features as similarly priced rivals

Our Verdict
If VPN coverage is your first priority…
Read More

Continue Reading
Antivirus

NITDA raises alarm on DeepLoad AI malware attacks, proffers solutions

“Never paste commands from a website into your computer; legitimate software never asks for this. Do not open files named ‘Chrome Setup’ or ‘Firefox Installer’ from USB drives; scan all USB devices with antivirus software before use,” the agency said, warning corporate companies of possible cyber attacks…

“Never paste commands from a website into your computer; legitimate software never asks for this. Do not open files named ‘Chrome Setup’ or ‘Firefox Installer’ from USB drives; scan all USB devices with antivirus software before use,” the agency said, warning corporate companies of possible cyber attacks…
Read More

Continue Reading